<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com">
<title>FN Online First</title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com</link>
<description>FN RSS Feed -- Online First</description>
<prism:eIssn>1468-2052</prism:eIssn>
<prism:publicationName>Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>1359-2998</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330739v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330396v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330519v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330311v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330454v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329981v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329756v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330462v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330661v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330003v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329795v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330521v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330720v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330549v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330059v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330533v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330176v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329808v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330266v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329322v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329946v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330137v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330134v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329591v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329369v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330148v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329312v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330053v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329515v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330108v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329535v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329674v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329960v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329495v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330066v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330160v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-328568v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2024-327480v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329260v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-328726v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329965v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329610v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329611v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330247v2?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-328872v3?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329670v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329885v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329684v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329456v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329370v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329608v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329757v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2024-327677v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2024-328292v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329163v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329403v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329771v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329377v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329683v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329563v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329533v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329451v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329639v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-328905v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329190v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-328914v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2024-328346v1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2012-303508v2?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://hwmaint.fn.bmj.com/misc/home/ADC_95x60.gif" />
</channel>
<image rdf:about="http://hwmaint.fn.bmj.com/misc/home/ADC_95x60.gif">
<title>Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition</title>
<url>http://hwmaint.fn.bmj.com/misc/home/ADC_95x60.gif</url>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330739v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Quality improvement or target-driven care? Reduced neonatal hypoglycaemia admissions but with long-term neurodevelopmental uncertainty]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330739v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>There remains much controversy and limited evidence base for the definition of neonatal hypoglycaemia, and in this context, we read with interest the article &lsquo;Term neonatal admissions for hypoglycaemia in England and Wales, 2012&ndash;2020: a population-based study...&rsquo;, which reports a reduction in term admissions for hypoglycaemia following publication of the British Association of Perinatal Medicine (BAPM) framework.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> This report reflects an important contribution to national efforts to reduce unnecessary intervention and parent-infant separation and it clearly demonstrates a service-level change over time.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> However, interpretation of these findings requires consideration of the wider policy and commissioning context, in which the BAPM framework was introduced. In particular, this framework was introduced alongside a much larger NHS-led quality-improvement and commissioning programme: Avoiding Term Admissions into Neonatal Units (ATAIN).<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> Neither provided information about or recommendations to monitor longer-term potential benefits and harms.</p><p>The ATAIN programme was introduced nationally in...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beardsall, K., Johnson, M. J., Belteki, G., Rajendran, G., Dastamani, A., Kaiser, J. R., Alsweiler, J. M., Harding, J. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-11T09:00:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2026-330739</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2026-330739</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Quality improvement or target-driven care? Reduced neonatal hypoglycaemia admissions but with long-term neurodevelopmental uncertainty]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Viewpoint</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330396v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Consideration of centre effects in BPD risk prediction]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330396v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><qd><p>"...all models are approximations. Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful. However, the approximate nature of the model must always be borne in mind..."</p><p>George E P Box (1987)<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref></p></qd></p><p>For over 30 years, there has been a near continuous effort to develop mathematical prediction models that will help clinicians and investigators distinguish between preterm infants who are likely to develop bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and those who are not.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2 3</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3"></cross-ref> The predictive performance of many demographic and clinical characteristics, medication exposures, imaging results and diagnostic biomarkers has been examined for this purpose and variably included into published prediction models.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2 4</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4"></cross-ref> Most models ultimately rely heavily on a few basic patient characteristics: the degree of prematurity at birth (often defined by gestational age, birth weight or both), patient sex, and the nature of the respiratory support administered at or near to the...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nelin, T. D., Jensen, E. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-10T09:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2026-330396</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2026-330396</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Consideration of centre effects in BPD risk prediction]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-10</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330519v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Neonatal hypertriglyceridaemia management: a UK survey of practices and perspectives]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330519v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Neonatal parenteral nutrition (PN) administration requires balancing optimal growth with the risks of hypertriglyceridaemia (HTG). Neonatal HTG is increasingly linked to higher rates of retinopathy of prematurity,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> sepsis<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> and mortality.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> However, there is a lack of consistent evidence-based guidelines around defining and managing HTG via adjusting intravenous lipid emulsions (IVLEs), leading to heterogeneous practice. This variation confounds further assessment of the risks of both suboptimal growth and HTG.</p><p>This survey explored current UK practices in lipid administration, definition of HTG and management. An online survey () was distributed to Level 2 and Level 3 neonatal units across the UK between April and August 2025 via email.</p><p>We received 114 responses from 91 neonatal units, of which 100 were used in the primary analysis (excluding duplicate responses). These included responses from all 15 (100%) neonatal networks, a &gt;60% response rate by hospital from 11 of the 15...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clark, R. M., Ganguly, S., Kulkarni, A. M., Fatima, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-02T09:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2026-330519</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2026-330519</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neonatal hypertriglyceridaemia management: a UK survey of practices and perspectives]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330311v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Postmortem examination after deaths in neonatal units in England and Wales, 2017-2022: a national observational study]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330311v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>Postmortem (PM) examination can be valuable after a baby&rsquo;s death, providing information about the cause of death and support for families. However, worldwide trends indicate declining neonatal PM rates. We aimed to analyse trends in PM offer and completion after deaths in neonatal units.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We used data from the National Neonatal Research Database on deaths in neonatal units in England, Wales and the Isle of Man (2017&ndash;2022). We used regression models to estimate rates of PM offer and completion and their association with selected clinical, socio-demographic and service-related variables. We report the relative risk (RR), with a p value &lt;0.05 considered statistically significant.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>PM offer and completion rates ranged from 56% to 62% and 15% to 18%, respectively. Compared with extremely preterm infants, term infants had higher PM completion rates (RR 2.25, 95% CI 1.94 to 2.62, p&lt;0.001). PM completion was less likely for babies of Asian (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.72, p&lt;0.001) or black mothers (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.99, p=0.04) when compared with babies of white mothers. Babies of mothers in the country&rsquo;s least deprived decile were more likely to have a PM completed (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.48, p=0.04), in comparison with the most deprived centile.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>This national study provides a near-contemporaneous perspective on neonatal PM and adds to existing evidence of low rates. These data indicate the need to address the root causes of variation in PM completion to ensure equity in the care of families after a neonatal death.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cirelli, C., Chehrazi, M., Giuliani, S., Ciccarone, A., Modi, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-06-02T09:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2026-330311</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2026-330311</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Postmortem examination after deaths in neonatal units in England and Wales, 2017-2022: a national observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-06-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330454v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Complex communication]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330454v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The translation of population-level, evidence-based medicine into individualised, compassionate conversations at the cotside is complex and requires professionals to use a range of communication techniques in a reflexive manner, adjusting the nuance of the conversation structure and content to the evolving response of the parent. The decisions that professionals make about the options they present to parents, and the language they use to express these options, have ethical dimensions due to the potential for epistemic injustice (injustice in the way information is shared) and nudging (in the way information and options are then presented) to occur.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> Nudging refers to the subtle communication practices that can be implemented to guide another person to a particular decision; for example, the order that management options are presented in or the emphasis placed on certain options.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> Nudging is not a morally neutral action as, depending on the nudge, there may...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peterson, J. L., Stark, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-27T09:00:16-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2026-330454</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2026-330454</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Complex communication]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329981v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Genetic considerations in perinatal stroke]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329981v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Perinatal stroke refers to cerebrovascular diseases occurring between 20 weeks of fetal development and 28 days after birth. Although the risk of perinatal stroke is quite high, ranging from 1 in 1000 to 3000 live births, our understanding of its aetiology, pathophysiology and management remains limited compared with other age groups. With advancements in neonatal and neurological care, it is essential to expand our knowledge to enable evidence-based, timely treatment and improve outcomes. Therefore, the first step is to better understand the underlying causes so that effective treatment and prevention strategies can be developed.</p><p>There are two types of perinatal strokes: acute symptomatic, wherein there is early neonatal presentation with focal seizures, encephalopathy or tone abnormality and presumed perinatal, in which an infantile hemiparetic cerebral palsy is observed. Neonatal arterial ischaemic stroke (NAIS) is the most common type (80%) of acute symptomatic perinatal stroke, and hence, is worth exploring in further detail, as...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kamate, M., Basavanagowda, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-25T09:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329981</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329981</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Genetic considerations in perinatal stroke]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329756v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Academic achievement in children born extremely preterm: a cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329756v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>Children born extremely preterm (EPT) vary greatly regarding academic outcomes, underscoring the need to investigate subgroups in large representative samples. This study aimed to (1) examine academic outcomes in EPT children versus full-term controls and (2) examine the role of maternal education, child sex, maternal origin, cognitive ability and the presence of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>National cohort study.</p></sec><sec><st>Setting</st><p>Sweden.</p></sec><sec><st>Patients</st><p>12-year follow-up of a cohort study, the Extremely Preterm Infants in Sweden Study, including children born EPT (n=449) and full-term controls (n=365).</p></sec><sec><st>Outcome measures</st><p>Data on school grades (mathematics, Swedish and English) and special education school attendance were obtained from registers.</p></sec><sec><st>Exposure</st><p>EPT group versus controls and subgroup analyses within the EPT group.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Compared with full-term controls, children born EPT more often attended special education schools (13.6% vs 0.5%; OR 28.5 (95% CI 6.9 to 117.5)) and those attending mainstream school more often received at least one failing grade (32.3% vs 5.2%; OR 8.7 (95% CI 5.2 to 14.5)). Of children with gestational age (GA) &le;23 weeks, 39% attended mainstream school and passed all three core subjects, compared with 65% of those born at 26 weeks (OR 0.34 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.62)). Among EPT children attending mainstream education, low GA, low maternal education, cognitive impairment and ADHD/ASD diagnosis increased the risk of poor academic achievement.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>EPT birth was associated with poor academic achievement, but the risk varies substantially within the EPT group, primarily based on cognitive impairment, ADHD/ASD diagnosis and maternal education. However, the risk of poor academic achievement among children born EPT remained after adjusting for confounders and mediators.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaul, Y. F., Johansson, M., Haavisto, A., Aden, U., Ka&#x0308;llen, K., Abrahamsson, T., Farooqi, A., Ley, D., Sa&#x0308;vman, K., Ohlin, A., Hellgren, K., Serenius, F., Thorell, L. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-25T09:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329756</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329756</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Academic achievement in children born extremely preterm: a cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330462v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Selective early medical treatment of the patent ductus arteriosus in extremely low gestational age infants: a pilot randomised controlled trial (SMART-PDA)]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330462v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To assess feasibility of recruitment and compare clinical outcomes in a trial of early selective treatment of a moderate&ndash;severe patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) or no intervention in the first 7 postnatal days in extremely preterm infants.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Multicentre, open-label, parallel-design pilot randomised controlled trial</p></sec><sec><st>Setting</st><p>Seven tertiary/quaternary neonatal intensive care units.</p></sec><sec><st>Patients</st><p>Infants &lt;26 weeks gestational age (GA) with a PDA diagnosed within 72 hours after birth.</p></sec><sec><st>Interventions</st><p>Participants were randomised to an early echocardiographic screening within the first 72 hours followed by selective medical treatment (SMART) strategy of a moderate&ndash;severe PDA shunt or no intervention in the first 7 days.</p></sec><sec><st>Main outcome measures</st><p>The primary feasibility outcome was the proportion of eligible infants enrolled. Important secondary outcomes included a composite clinical endpoint of survival without major morbidity.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>116 of 185 eligible infants were enrolled (63%, 95% CI 56% to 70%; SMART, n=51, Control, n=53). Of them, 104/116 (90%) (mean GA 24.3 weeks, birth weight 714 g) were randomised. Protocol deviation was 1.9%. Based on the treatment algorithm, 24% infants randomised to SMART never required treatment. Median treatment initiation age in the SMART arm was 2 days (IQR 1&ndash;2.5 days). The SMART strategy demonstrated an 85% probability of a better Win ratio (1.34, 95% CrIs 0.73 to 2.5) compared with control.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>A trial of selective early PDA pharmacotherapy based on clinical and echocardiography grading of PDA shunt volume in the smallest infants is feasible with minimal protocol deviation. Early echocardiography screening and selective pharmacotherapy using the SMART-PDA algorithm may enhance the probability of survival with less morbidities in infants born &lt;26 weeks GA.</p></sec><sec><st>Trial registration number</st><p><A HREF="NCT05011149">NCT05011149</A>.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitra, S., Hebert, A., Castaldo, M. P., Disher, T., El-Naggar, W., Dhillon, S., Alhassen, Z., Koo, J., Katheria, A. C., Hyderi, A., Kumaran, K., Ting, J., Surak, A., Larocque, J., Pepper, D., Hornberger, L., Makoni, M., Weisz, D. E., Jain, A., Bacchini, F., Cameron-Nola, A. J. J., Hatfield, T., Dorling, J., McNamara, P. J., Thabane, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-18T09:00:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2026-330462</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2026-330462</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Selective early medical treatment of the patent ductus arteriosus in extremely low gestational age infants: a pilot randomised controlled trial (SMART-PDA)]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330661v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preterm Noonan syndrome with generalised venolymphatic malformation]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330661v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>A preterm female neonate born at 34 weeks&rsquo; gestation with Noonan syndrome caused by a de novo pathogenic <I>PTPN11</I> variant<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> and ductus venosus agenesis presented with severe generalised oedema, bilateral chylothorax and prominent caput medusae. Postnatally, immediate intubation was required for respiratory insufficiency, followed by bilateral chest drains for severe pleural effusions. Magnetic resonance angiography demonstrated diffuse subcutaneous and intrapulmonary lymphangiectasia, consistent with a generalised venolymphatic malformation.</p><p>Conventional management, including medium-chain triglyceride-based nutrition, corticosteroids, octreotide and sirolimus, failed to achieve clinical improvement. Given the underlying <I>PTPN11</I>-associated RAS/MAPK pathway dysregulation, trametinib, a selective MEK1/2 inhibitor,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2 3</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3"></cross-ref> was initiated at 6 weeks after birth to target the pathogenic MAPK overactivation thought to drive the lymphatic disorder. Within 2 weeks, oedema and caput medusae regressed substantially, accompanied by marked respiratory improvement, allowing for extubation at 8 weeks after birth (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1A,B</cross-ref>). Apart from acne comedonica, no treatment-related adverse effects...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Winkler, M., Baik-Schneditz, N., Benesch, M., Jauch, S. F., Schwaberger, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-14T09:00:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2026-330661</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2026-330661</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preterm Noonan syndrome with generalised venolymphatic malformation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Images in neonatal medicine</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330003v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Should delayed umbilical cord clamping at birth be practised in monochorionic twin pregnancies?]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330003v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Delayed cord clamping (DCC) has been widely adopted internationally, especially in babies born preterm, as it is associated with reduced perinatal mortality and morbidity.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1 2</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2"></cross-ref> There has been controversy as to whether this practice should extend to the management of monochorionic twin pregnancies.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref></p><p>Twins face a higher risk of loss compared with singletons, mainly due to increased rates of congenital malformations, preterm birth, fetal growth restriction and specific complications of monochorionic twins.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4">4</cross-ref> Monochorionic twins have higher fetal and neonatal loss rates than dichorionic twins. The angioarchitecture of the shared monochorionic twin placenta is characterised by conjoining of fetal circulations through arterial to venous, arterial-to-arterial and venous-to-venous vascular anastomoses.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R5">5</cross-ref> The type and number of vascular anastomoses are variable, as may be the relative volume of placental mass associated with each twin. These factors may lead to unequal fetal growth.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R6">6</cross-ref> They...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kilby, M. D., Gibson, J. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T09:00:16-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-330003</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-330003</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Should delayed umbilical cord clamping at birth be practised in monochorionic twin pregnancies?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329795v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Neonatal stroke active surveillance BPSU study in the UK and the Republic of Ireland with a meta-analysis of national surveillance studies]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329795v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>Assess the incidence, presentation, management and short-term outcomes of neonatal stroke in the UK and Ireland (ROI).</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Active surveillance (British Paediatric Surveillance Unit) study and meta-analysis of national surveillance studies.</p></sec><sec><st>Setting</st><p>UK and ROI.</p></sec><sec><st>Patients</st><p>Neonatal stroke presenting &lt;90 days old in term and preterm infants between March 2022 and April 2023.</p></sec><sec><st>Interventions</st><p>Reporting clinicians completed questionnaires and uploaded de-identified neuroimages via a purpose-built data platform.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>68 neonatal stroke cases were reported in the UK and ROI. UK incidence was 9.0 per 100 000 live births (95% CI 6.9 to 11.6). Three-quarters were arterial ischaemic and unilateral. Arterial ischaemic and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) strokes commonly presented with seizures at 2&ndash;3 days of age, while haemorrhagic stroke commonly presented with encephalopathy in the first ten days of age. Neonatal stroke was associated with fetal distress in utero. 61% of infants had an umbilical pH &lt;7.25 and 28% required significant resuscitation at birth, respectively. A meta-analysis of 3 607 864 infants found our reported incidence and associated conditions were similar to surveillance studies in Germany and Australia.</p><p>Guidelines were available in a quarter of reporting hospitals. 87% of infants with arterial ischaemic and CVST stroke received antiseizure medications. 82% of infants were discharged home at 12 days old (median) with antiseizure medications (42%) alongside paediatric/neonatal (91%), physiotherapy (77%) and paediatric neurology (63%) follow-up.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Neonatal stroke is rare, with distinct subtypes associated with different presentations, timings and management strategies, highlighting the need to better understand this condition.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kwok, T. C., Dineen, R. A., Whitehouse, W. P., Lynn, R. M., McSweeney, N., Sharkey, D., on behalf of the UK/Irish Neonatal Stroke Study Collaborative]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-13T09:00:16-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329795</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329795</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neonatal stroke active surveillance BPSU study in the UK and the Republic of Ireland with a meta-analysis of national surveillance studies]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330521v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Role of ultrasonography in the management of necrotising enterocolitis: time for routine practice?]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330521v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In 1986, Walsh and Kliegman published the modified Bell criteria for stratifying necrotising enterocolitis (NEC).<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> In the four decades since, very little has changed&mdash;the criteria they proposed for each stage are widely used and the treatment options are essentially the same. Management of NEC remains basic: a cessation of feeding, gastric decompression and intravenous antibiotics. Some babies undergo surgery. This would not be an issue but for the fact that outcomes for NEC remain poor. The majority of babies who contract NEC will either die or have lifelong sequelae.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> This is in contrast to outcomes for the majority of preterm babies who do not contract NEC which are generally good and have seen consistent year-on-year improvements. It is also the case that clinicians (both surgeons and neonatologists) find it challenging to decide which babies with NEC require surgery. This fact alone is felt to negatively impact...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethell, G. S., Jones, I., Hall, N. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-12T09:00:16-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2026-330521</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2026-330521</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Role of ultrasonography in the management of necrotising enterocolitis: time for routine practice?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330720v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Exclude or include? Monochorionicity as a part of benchmarking standards in deferred cord clamping]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330720v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Deferred cord clamping (DCC) has become increasingly widespread across neonatal practice, given its documented benefits with respect to neonatal survival and other important metrics.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> As such, it is one of the benchmarked standards assessed by the National Neonatal Audit Programme (NNAP), which states that 75% of babies born before 34 weeks should have their cord clamped at or after 1 min.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref></p><p>There have been recent publications reporting the risk of harm associated with DCC in instances of monochorionic multiples,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> where there can be acute twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome and increases in preterm brain injury. Multiple pregnancies of any chorionicity were excluded from many of the studies in the original meta-analyses investigating DCC,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> so data on this cohort are limited and still emerging.</p><p>Currently, monochorionicity is not an exclusion criterion for DCC according to the NNAP benchmarking standard, and these babies are included in the analysis and interunit...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[King, A., Chowdhury, O.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-08T09:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2026-330720</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2026-330720</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Exclude or include? Monochorionicity as a part of benchmarking standards in deferred cord clamping]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330549v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Management of muscular hypertonia in infants: survey of current UK practice]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330549v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec id="s1"><st>Management of muscular hypertonia in infants: a survey of UK practice</st><p>Treatment for muscular hypertonia in infants may be initiated in neonatal units or outpatient clinics by a range of different professionals. There is no high-quality evidence guiding treatment.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> A 2019 UK review of children with cerebral palsy (CP) reported that most had mixed movement disorders/CP subtypes.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> Baclofen was commonly prescribed in all subtypes of CP, while trihexyphenidyl, gabapentin and clonidine were more often used in dystonia and choreoathetosis than spasticity. Infants were not represented.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> A 2024 review recommended baclofen as first-line treatment for childhood generalised dystonia, with clonidine and gabapentin as alternatives.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> Benzodiazepines and trihexyphenidyl were not recommended. The quality of evidence was low.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> No consideration was given to age, despite evidence that neurotransmitter profiles can change from fetal to adult life,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4">4</cross-ref> meaning infants may respond differently...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rabindranathnambi, N., Karuvattil, R., Vollmer, B., Hart, A. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-05-06T09:00:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2026-330549</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2026-330549</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Management of muscular hypertonia in infants: survey of current UK practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-05-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330059v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Ethical considerations for using alternative methods of consent in neonatal clinical trials: recommendations from a modified Delphi consensus process]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330059v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Importance</st><p>Neonatal clinical trials frequently encounter low enrolment rates, challenges obtaining consent and biased research populations. Alternative approaches to consent have been proposed to address these concerns but introduce complex ethical trade-offs.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>Using a modified Delphi approach with diverse stakeholders, we aimed to create recommendations for the use of alternative methods of consent in neonatal clinical trials.</p></sec><sec><st>Findings</st><p>Our process resulted in 21 recommendations within three categories. In &lsquo;deciding whether to use alternative methods of consent&rsquo;, we present five statements to guide whether alternative methods are appropriate. For example, heightened justification may be required for early phase research or allocation arms that are highly preference-sensitive for families. In &lsquo;preallocation information and ability to opt-out&rsquo;, we present 11 statements related to information sharing with families of potential participants. These include guidance on researcher communication and guidance for passive information sharing such as via flyers. In &lsquo;postallocation information and decision to continue participation&rsquo;, we present five statements to guide later information sharing. These focus on best practices for researcher communication postallocation. For two items, our Working Group could not reach consensus. These items were not included in our recommendations.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions and relevance</st><p>Our recommendations may guide researchers, clinicians, regulators and funders in the consideration and conduct of alternative methods of consent for neonatal clinical trials. Future work must evaluate these recommendations within neonatal clinical trials and the areas of lack of consensus among our Working Group.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weiss, E. M., Brickler, A., Beretta, A., Ahmad, K. A., Dickert, N. W., Dorner, R. A., Field, E., Guttmann, K., Katheria, A. C., Kukora, S. K., Montoya-Williams, D., Mooso, B. A., Kraft, S. A., on behalf of FAM-CONNECT Collaborative]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-30T09:00:16-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-330059</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-330059</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Ethical considerations for using alternative methods of consent in neonatal clinical trials: recommendations from a modified Delphi consensus process]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330533v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Developmental follow-up, surveillance and support at the age of 4 years: a best practice guide from the British Association for Neonatal Neurodevelopmental Follow-Up]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2026-330533v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Developmental follow-up is a necessary part of neonatal care to identify additional support needs but also to allow national surveillance and research. Follow-up at 4 years of age enables assessment before school entry, allowing schools to be ready for and support children and their families. This is not currently routine across the UK despite the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommendations in 2017. This best practice guide was developed by the British Association for Neonatal Neurodevelopmental Follow-Up, a special interest group of the British Association of Perinatal Medicine.</p><p>This framework supports clinicians developing and delivering a 4-year developmental follow-up service for children whose neonatal experiences put them at risk of developmental conditions or additional learning needs. This should include as a minimum those born before 28 weeks&rsquo; gestation and infants with moderate to severe neonatal encephalopathy. Infants with risk factors for developmental problems should also be considered.</p><p>This framework recommends assessment of developmental domains including physical development and growth, cognitive development, emotional and behavioural development, sensory needs, speech, language and communication skills, social skills and relationships. A summary report should be shared with caregivers and key individuals in health, education and social care. This should describe the child&rsquo;s strengths and needs to support transition into and throughout education.</p><p>Specific service arrangements will vary depending on local resources and existing services. This framework provides guidance for clinical teams to enhance follow-up for children whose early experiences put them at risk of challenges, facilitating lifelong learning, participation and well-being.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mckinnon, K., Arasu, A., Beckmann, J., Bosworth, J., Chisholm, P., Crawford, A., Galland, L., Johnson, S., Johnston, L., Kaiser, A., McMahon, E., Sammut, A., Seregni, F., Leven, L., Negoita, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-29T09:00:16-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2026-330533</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2026-330533</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Developmental follow-up, surveillance and support at the age of 4 years: a best practice guide from the British Association for Neonatal Neurodevelopmental Follow-Up]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Guideline</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330176v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Probiotics for extremely preterm infants: a Norwegian population-based study]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330176v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To compare mortality and morbidity in extremely preterm (EPT) and/or extremely low birthweight (ELBW) infants receiving or not receiving probiotic supplementation.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Nationwide, population-based registry study.</p></sec><sec><st>Setting</st><p>All neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Norway.</p></sec><sec><st>Participants</st><p>All EPT (&lt;28 weeks)/ELBW (&lt;1000 g) infants born between 2014 and 2021, admitted to an NICU. Infants who within the first week of life died, underwent surgery for necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) or did not receive enteral feeds or started with probiotics after the first week of life were excluded from the main analyses. Logistic regression, propensity score matching, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and clustering analyses were applied.</p></sec><sec><st>Main outcome measures</st><p>The primary outcome was all-cause mortality after the first week of life. Secondary outcomes were surgical NEC and late-onset sepsis after the first week of life, growth and probiotic sepsis.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among 1596 live-born EPT/ELBW infants, 1268 were included in the main analysis and 676 (53.5%) started probiotics in the first week of life. Probiotics were associated with lower all-cause mortality (IPTW analysis; adjusted OR (aOR) 0.65, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.97), but no reduction in surgical NEC (aOR 0.83, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.43). However, in an emulated intention-to-treat scenario, high (&gt;80%) probiotic use versus low (&lt; 30%) was associated with a reduction in surgical NEC (aOR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.86). We found no association between probiotics and sepsis or growth. 5 out of 858 infants (0.58%) exposed to probiotics developed probiotic-associated sepsis, all survived.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Probiotic supplementation to EPT/ELBW infants was associated with lower all-cause mortality and possibly reduced NEC.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hapnes, N. C., Stensvold, H. J., Dalen, I., Guthe, H. J. T., Stoen, R., Solevag, A. L., Moltu, S. J., Ronnestad, A., Klingenberg, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-29T09:00:16-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-330176</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-330176</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Probiotics for extremely preterm infants: a Norwegian population-based study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-29</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329808v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Can targeting IL-1 mediated inflammation improve outcomes after neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy?]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329808v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec id="s1"><st>Introduction</st><p>Neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) caused by inadequate oxygenation and cerebral blood flow at birth has an incidence rate of 1&ndash;3 per 1000 live births in high-resource settings. Survivors of HIE frequently experience long-term impairments, including cerebral palsy, epilepsy and borderline to extremely low IQ even in the absence of cerebral palsy.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref></p><sec id="s1-1"><st>Pathogenesis</st><p>HIE pathogenesis involves a cascade of metabolic, excitotoxic and inflammatory processes.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> The primary phase begins with ATP depletion, oxidative stress and excitotoxicity leading to neuronal death. This is followed by a latent phase (6&ndash;12 hours) of transient metabolic recovery providing a therapeutic window. Without intervention, a secondary phase ensues, characterised by mitochondrial dysfunction, apoptosis and inflammation. A tertiary phase may persist for weeks to months, marked by chronic neuroinflammation, gliosis and impaired repair.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref></p><p>Chronic neuroinflammation is driven by persistent microglial and astrocytic activation, releasing cytokines such as interleukin-1 (IL-1), a key upstream inflammatory mediator.<cross-ref...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patel, D., Ramanan, A. V., Chakkarapani, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-28T09:00:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329808</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329808</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Can targeting IL-1 mediated inflammation improve outcomes after neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-28</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Viewpoint</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330266v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Making sense of the evidence: designing randomised controlled trials for preterm infants with high-shunt volume patent ductus arteriosus]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330266v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Management of the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants remains controversial. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that administering pharmacotherapy, predominantly ibuprofen, a cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor, to infants selected based on the standard echocardiography approach to diagnosis (eg, duct diameter and shunt direction), does not improve outcomes and may lead to harm. It remains uncertain, however, whether eliminating or reducing PDA shunt volume using an intervention with higher efficacy and fewer adverse effects, or in a more selective population, would show different results. It is possible that an imprecise approach to patient selection exposes low-risk infants to the adverse effects of pharmacotherapy without benefit and high-risk infants to the synergistic adverse effects of pharmacotherapy and persistent high volume pathological shunt when treatment fails. Whether targeted management of moderate-high volume PDA shunts, informed by comprehensive echocardiography adjudication, in the highest risk infants is beneficial remains untested in an RCT setting. Furthermore, both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions warrant further investigation. High quality practice changing research requires a collaborative approach between haemodynamic specialists, epidemiologists and trial methodologists to (1) define the study population based on phenotypic profiles of high-risk infants; (2) enhance the choice and timing of intervention; and (3) identify outcome measures that are relevant and clinically meaningful to families. In this review, we summarise evidence from RCTs and observational studies by discerning discrepancies and exploring potential explanations. Such an approach is essential to establish whether active PDA treatment confers any measurable benefit for high-risk preterm infants.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Battersby, C., Levy, P. T., Gupta, S., de Boode, W. P., Mitra, S., McNamara, P. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-27T09:00:16-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-330266</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-330266</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Making sense of the evidence: designing randomised controlled trials for preterm infants with high-shunt volume patent ductus arteriosus]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Reviews</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329322v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prognostic value of haemodynamic and neurophysiological assessments in newborns with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy undergoing whole-body therapeutic hypothermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329322v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To evaluate the prognostic value of amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG), cerebral near-infrared spectroscopy (cNIRS) and targeted neonatal echocardiography (TnECHO) for predicting short-term outcomes in neonates with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) undergoing therapeutic hypothermia (TH).</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p></sec><sec><st>Data sources</st><p>MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library were searched to 16 April 2025. The review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023387592).</p></sec><sec><st>Eligibility criteria</st><p>Prognostic studies of neonates &ge;35 weeks&rsquo; gestation with HIE treated with TH, reporting short-term outcomes: death, abnormal brain MRI or a composite of both.</p></sec><sec><st>Data extraction and synthesis</st><p>Data were extracted independently. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic OR (DOR) and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated using a random-effects model.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-seven studies (n=2836) were included; 26 (n=2268) contributed to meta-analyses. Abnormal aEEG background at 24 hours predicted abnormal MRI with sensitivity 0.76 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.94), specificity 0.70 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.87), DOR 5.91 (95% CI 2.00 to 17.49) and AUC 0.72. Abnormal cNIRS at 48 hours showed comparable prediction with sensitivity 0.77 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.89), specificity 0.61 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.91), DOR 8.38 (95% CI 2.02 to 34.66) and AUC 0.79. TnECHO-detected pulmonary hypertension had limited prognostic value with DOR 2.08 (95% CI 0.36 to 11.9) and AUC 0.62. Right ventricular function measures showed substantial heterogeneity in sensitivity and DOR.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>aEEG and cNIRS between 24 hours and 48 hours could offer reasonable prognostic value for detecting brain injury in HIE. TnECHO has limited predictive utility in isolation. Multimodal approaches may enhance early risk stratification and should be explored in future studies.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noureldein, M., So, V., Hayawi, L., Saker, A., Renesme, L., Tsampalieros, A., Ben Fadel, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-22T09:00:17-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329322</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329322</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prognostic value of haemodynamic and neurophysiological assessments in newborns with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy undergoing whole-body therapeutic hypothermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329946v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Serial physical examination for screening and management of early-onset neonatal sepsis: a pragmatic next step in the journey of antibiotic stewardship?]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329946v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Early-onset neonatal sepsis (EOS) is a rare but serious illness in term or late preterm infants (incidence of 0.5&ndash;1/1000 live births) with a mortality rate of 2&ndash;3%.<sup><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref></sup> Historically, the imperative to protect the few infants with genuine sepsis had led to a widespread use of antibiotics in many healthy newborns. However, growing concerns about antimicrobial resistance, disruption of the neonatal microbiome with possible implications for further late-onset diseases and unnecessary medicalisation in the postnatal period have prompted a reassessment of this approach. In the pursuit of both optimal neonatal EOS management and responsible antibiotic stewardship, clinicians have adopted structured risk management tools. Three principal approaches have emerged: categorical univariate risk assessment guidelines from the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC); the Kaiser Permanente Sepsis Risk Calculator (SRC); and the serial physical examination (SPE) model. Each strategy...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Banerjee, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-17T09:00:22-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329946</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329946</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Serial physical examination for screening and management of early-onset neonatal sepsis: a pragmatic next step in the journey of antibiotic stewardship?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330137v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Accounting for multiple births in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a methodological systematic review]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330137v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>Multiple births are common in randomised trials targeting preterm populations. Clustering due to multiple births is often overlooked in individual trials and may impact the results of meta-analyses that pool their results. We aimed to assess how multiple births have been handled in the reporting and meta-analyses of recent systematic reviews.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>We conducted a methodological systematic review of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews. The search was conducted on 10 September 2024 in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and PubMed for articles published in the previous 12 months. Reviews were eligible if they involved randomised trials of interventions delivered in pregnancy or infancy, included multiple births and reported results of at least one aggregate data meta-analysis for an infant outcome.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>After screening 222 articles, 39 had unclear eligibility due to making no mention of multiple births and nine met the eligibility criteria (five Cochrane and four non-Cochrane reviews). Multiple births were inconsistently handled across included reviews. The degree of clustering due to multiple births was poorly described and meta-analyses accounting for clustering were rarely reported (2/9 reviews; 22%). CIs around pooled treatment effect estimates were wider after accounting for clustering.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Clustering due to multiple births is a poorly recognised issue in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Given the potential for this clustering to alter conclusions about the effectiveness of interventions, we recommend accounting for clustering due to multiple births in future meta-analyses.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yelland, L. N., Robledo, K. P., Lange, K. M., Sullivan, T. R., Libesman, S., Shepherd, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-17T09:00:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-330137</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-330137</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Accounting for multiple births in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a methodological systematic review]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330134v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Follow-up of children born very preterm: the need for evidence-based frameworks to drive best practice and standardised care]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330134v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Maternal and neonatal intensive care has seen significant advances over the last four decades. Survival of preterm babies has risen dramatically, most marked in high-income countries, even as the gestational age for offering neonatal intensive care has reduced.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1 2</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2"></cross-ref> Nonetheless, children born very preterm (VP, &lt;32 weeks&rsquo; gestation) face greater challenges to their health, growth and development compared with their peers born full-term.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1&ndash;3</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2"></cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3"></cross-ref> The risk is higher the lower the gestational age at birth.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1&ndash;3</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2"></cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3"></cross-ref> There is also mounting evidence that preterm birth affects parent mental health, which in turn may augment the impact on their child&rsquo;s development.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4">4</cross-ref></p><p>The impact of VP birth is well documented. Children born VP have up to 14 times the odds of hospitalisation up to 9 months, and 3 times the odds of asthma and wheezing by 5 years...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheong, J. L. Y., Morgan, A., Hintz, S. R., Williams, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-17T09:00:21-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-330134</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-330134</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Follow-up of children born very preterm: the need for evidence-based frameworks to drive best practice and standardised care]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Viewpoint</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329591v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Investigating variations and early-life temporal changes in oxygen saturation indices in healthy moderate-late preterm and term infants: a cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329591v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Neonatal respiratory system immaturity causes unstable breathing patterns during sleep, resulting in respiratory events and intermittent hypoxaemia (IH). The recent literature correlates frequent respiratory events with adverse early neurodevelopmental outcomes.</p></sec><sec><st>Aims</st><p>This study investigated 5-week temporal changes in oxygen saturation indices in healthy moderate-late preterm (MLPT) (born between 32+0 weeks and 36+6 weeks of gestation) and term (born between 37+0 weeks and 41+6 weeks of gestation) infants.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>MLPT and term infants&rsquo; sleeping postductal saturations were measured using nocturnal pulse oximetry at 7 days, 14 days, 21 days, 28 days and 35 days (&plusmn;3 days) postnatal age. This recorded mean peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO<SUB>2</SUB>), Oxygen Desaturation Indices (ODIs) 3, 4 and 10 (number of desaturations &gt;3%, &gt;4% and &gt;10% per hour) and mean nadir SpO<SUB>2</SUB> &gt;3%.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>34 infants were studied (17 per group). The groups&rsquo; median gestations were 35+0 weeks and 39+5 weeks, respectively. Generalised linear mixed modelling indicated increasing mean saturations from 94.98% in week 1 to 96.68% in week 5 (p&lt;0.001) for both groups together, with no significant group differences. MLPT infants&rsquo; average mean nadir SpO<SUB>2</SUB> &gt;3% was 89.94% versus 91.55% for term infants (p=0.005), with both groups improving throughout the study (p=0.006). MLPT infants had 2.08 times more ODI3 dips/hour (p&lt;0.001), 2.49 times more ODI4 dips/hour (p&lt;0.001) and 6.66 times more ODI10 dips/hour (p=0.005) than term infants.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>This study demonstrated significant differences in IH prevalence and severity between groups. Further research is needed to evaluate IH&rsquo;s impact on neurodevelopmental outcomes in this population.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilkinson, T. L., James, J., Clarke, J., Howarth, Z., Joseph, I., Lawley, M., McDermott, B., Renton, M., Wilson, C., Yuen, H. M., Johnson, M. J., Evans, H. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T09:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329591</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329591</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Investigating variations and early-life temporal changes in oxygen saturation indices in healthy moderate-late preterm and term infants: a cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329369v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Outcome in childhood and adolescence following hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329369v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This is an invited editorial on the report by Reese <I>et al</I><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> of the outcome in adolescence among children with neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) relative to population controls. The strengths of this study are the length of follow-up and assessment of school performance on a regional cohort of children. The authors found that children with moderate or severe HIE perform at a lower academic level than their peers, but most pass their grade level. Questions remain regarding the unaccounted numbers in (1) and loss to follow-up (supplement 2 and table 3); data are presented on 58% and 61% of children with and without HIE, respectively. It is interesting that the use of hypothermia for moderate or severe HIE increased from 49% to 77% between 2008 and 2013. It is unclear why more infants with moderate or severe HIE did not receive hypothermia, given that it was usual care in...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shankaran, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-15T09:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329369</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329369</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Outcome in childhood and adolescence following hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-15</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330148v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Diagnostic yield and imaging: aetiology correlations in prenatal intracranial haemorrhage-a retrospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330148v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To characterise aetiologies and prenatal neuroimaging findings in fetuses with intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), and evaluate the ability of imaging to suggest underlying causes.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We retrospectively reviewed fetuses with ICH diagnosed prenatally at a single tertiary fetal centre between 2015 and 2025. Cases with a known mechanism at presentation were excluded. Ultrasound (US) and MRI images were reassessed by fetal medicine and neuroradiology specialists blinded to aetiology. Clinical, laboratory, genetic, autopsy and placental findings were integrated to determine underlying causes and assess imaging patterns.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Sixty-seven fetuses were included; a definitive aetiology was identified in 38.8% (26/67). Genetic aetiologies were detected in 27.7% (13/47) of cases with advanced genetic testing, most commonly associated with cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD). Other causes included infection (5/67, 7.5%), fetal anaemia (6/67, 9%), and coagulopathy (3/67, 4.5%, of which one was genetic). Twenty-one cases (31.3%) remained unexplained despite comprehensive investigation, and 20 (29.9%) had incomplete investigations. Intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) was present in 91% (61/67), with periventricular haemorrhagic infarction (PVHI) in 55.2% (37/67). CSVD was associated with multifocal PVHI, porencephaly, white matter injury and frequent brainstem involvement. In fetal anaemia, cerebellar haemorrhage was common, with brainstem and vermian involvement predominantly in non-parvovirus cases. Intraparenchymal haemorrhage without IVH occurred mainly with coagulopathy or infection. Although some phenotypic clustering was observed, there was substantial overlap among aetiologic groups.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Genetic disorders, particularly CSVD, account for a significant proportion of prenatal ICH, supporting routine genomic testing. Imaging can suggest probable causes, but overlap limits its diagnostic specificity.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shinar, S., Carmant, L. S., Tripathy, P., Wade, N., Shannon, P., Chong, K., Chitayat, D., Miller, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-14T09:00:15-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-330148</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-330148</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Diagnostic yield and imaging: aetiology correlations in prenatal intracranial haemorrhage-a retrospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-14</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329312v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prenatal characteristics and postnatal outcomes of small fetal hepatic lesions: a retrospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329312v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To describe prenatal characteristics and postnatal outcomes of fetal hepatic lesions diagnosed on prenatal ultrasound and to identify prognostic factors of this condition.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A retrospective study was conducted in a cohort of fetuses diagnosed with hepatic lesions between 2011 and 2023 at a tertiary referral center. Prenatal and postnatal data were collected, including lesion type, size, gestational age at detection, associated anomalies, genetic abnormalities, growth restriction and pregnancy outcomes. Postnatal follow-up included imaging, lesion resolution and overall health status.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>65 fetuses were identified. Most lesions were echogenic (n=55); a minority were cystic (n=7), mixed (n=1) or subcapsular hematomas (n=2). Multiple lesions were present in 38%. Stillbirths, including fetal death and pregnancy termination, occurred in 18%, predominantly in the setting of major associated anomalies, fetal growth restriction and/or genetic abnormalities. Of 48 liveborn infants, 96% were healthy at discharge. Among 31 infants followed postnatally, 75% showed lesion resolution by 21 months. At the 5-year median follow-up, 79% were healthy. Echogenic lesions were more common in healthy infants, while a cystic component was associated with a higher rate of concurrent clinically significant health conditions, although liver function was typically normal.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Isolated small echogenic fetal hepatic lesions display a favorable prognosis with spontaneous resolution in most cases. Adverse pregnancy outcomes are common in cases with associated anomalies, fetal growth restriction and genetic abnormalities; therefore, counseling should be guided by a comprehensive anomaly assessment and appropriate genetic evaluation.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heiman, S., Weiss, B., Yousefi, S., Lassman, S., Elkan-Miller, T., Kassif, E., Weissbach, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-03T09:00:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329312</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329312</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prenatal characteristics and postnatal outcomes of small fetal hepatic lesions: a retrospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330053v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Neonatal jaundice assessment across all skin tones: finding the gaps between guidelines and practice]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330053v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline &lsquo;Jaundice in newborn babies under 28 days&rsquo; (CG98) provides an evidence-based framework for this common condition.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> However, the 2023 National Health Service (NHS) Race and Health Observatory report highlighted how current neonatal jaundice practice contributes to race-related healthcare disparities.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> Infants from black, South Asian or other non-white ethnic groups are at a disproportionate risk of complications from severe jaundice, making up 50% of all cases of kernicterus despite representing only 25% of UK live births.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> Furthermore, evidence suggests that transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) measurements are less precise in neonates with dark skin. However, these findings are derived from studies with small sample sizes and additional data are needed to robustly assess the impact of skin tone on TcB and serum bilirubin (SBR) concordance.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref></p><p>As part of the Research, Evaluation and Audit for Child...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cornwell, J., Michaud Maturana, M., Mena, J., Pillay, K., Meek, J., Singh, C., Howard, S. R., Loucaides, E., The London REACH Network Collaborative]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-04-01T09:00:12-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-330053</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-330053</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neonatal jaundice assessment across all skin tones: finding the gaps between guidelines and practice]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329515v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparison of functional features and user experience with different types of video laryngoscopes when used on neonatal manikins]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329515v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>A wide range of neonatal-specific video laryngoscopes (VLs) are now available, each offering unique design features. Understanding these differences is essential to support training and optimise clinical use in neonatal airway management.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>To compare the physical and functional characteristics of four commonly used neonatal VLs and assess user experience.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>In this observational study, four VL systems&mdash;C-MAC, GlideScope, InfantView and NeoView were evaluated. A technical comparison of blade design and dimensions was performed across available blade sizes, alongside a conventional Miller blade. Medical professionals attending a neonatal airway workshop then used each device on neonatal manikins and rated their experience using a 4-point scale across six domains: ease of use, airway visualisation, ease of intubation, image quality, blade size and blade design.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 23 participants with varied clinical backgrounds completed the evaluation. While 65% routinely performed neonatal intubations, 80% reported fewer than 10 intubations annually and 65% preferred conventional laryngoscopy. Following the trial, most participants favoured the C-MAC and NeoView VLs, and GlideScope was perceived to mimic conventional laryngoscope. The NeoView and C-MAC devices had the shortest distance between the camera and the distal blade tip. All VLs supported video and image capture. NeoView and GlideScope used disposable blades, while others employed reusable blades.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>This study provides a systematic comparison of the physical features and user preferences for commonly available neonatal VLs. These insights can guide equipment selection, inform training programmes and promote safer neonatal airway management.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kannan Loganathan, P., Yasmeen, T., Nair, V., OShea, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-27T09:00:26-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329515</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329515</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparison of functional features and user experience with different types of video laryngoscopes when used on neonatal manikins]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330108v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Current knowledge and future perspectives on management and prevention of group B streptococcus in neonates and young infants]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330108v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Group B Streptococcus (GBS) remains a leading cause of neonatal sepsis and meningitis in the UK, with an incidence of around 0.9 per 1000 live births. Early-onset disease usually results from vertical transmission during delivery, while late-onset disease is also acquired through postnatal exposures. GBS disease presents as sepsis, meningitis or pneumonia and leads to death in 6% of affected infants and long-term neurodevelopmental impairment in up to a third of survivors. The current UK prevention strategy of risk-based intra-partum antibiotic prophylaxis has several limitations, including lack of impact on disease burden in infants without associated risk factors and on late-onset disease. Ongoing studies of universal antenatal GBS screening and GBS maternal immunisations, along with a new British Paediatric Surveillance Unit surveillance study to provide updated epidemiological data will help to guide policy and practice.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Young, A. N., Karampatsas, K., Ladhani, S. N., Lamagni, T. L., Le Doare, K., Peacock, J., Thorn, N., Heath, P. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-16T09:00:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-330108</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-330108</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Current knowledge and future perspectives on management and prevention of group B streptococcus in neonates and young infants]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Reviews</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329535v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Twin congenital heart disease in the setting of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329535v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Twin 1 (birth weight (BW) 1835 g, gestation 33+4) of monochorionic, diamniotic twins (MCDA) presented with a 4/6 murmur on postnatal examination. The pregnancy was affected by mild twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). The echocardiogram in Twin 1 (recipient) revealed severe pulmonary stenosis (gradient 134 mm Hg, <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>). The infant underwent balloon valvuloplasty on day 14 of life. In week 3 of life, Twin 2 (BW 1300 g) was noted to have a murmur. An echocardiogram showed coarctation of the aorta (CoA) (descending aorta 2.5 mm at narrowest point, <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>). Surgical intervention was not indicated. Both twins had normal routine cardiac views antenatally.</p><p>Congenital heart defects (CHDs) are the most common birth defect worldwide with a prevalence of 20 in 1000 live births for twin pregnancies.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> Rising maternal age and increased use of in vitro fertilisation have led to a higher prevalence of MCDA twins and subsequent...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Munn-Bookless, K., Sands, A., Karayiannis, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-16T09:00:19-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329535</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329535</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Twin congenital heart disease in the setting of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Images in neonatal medicine</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329674v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Randomised trial of early rapid saline bolus versus epinephrine during resuscitation in perinatal haemorrhagic cardiac arrest in newborn lambs]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329674v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To determine the impact of early rapid saline bolus during resuscitation on (1) time to achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and (2) systemic haemodynamics, oxygenation, myocardial stress markers and pulmonary oedema.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Randomised controlled trial.</p></sec><sec><st>Setting</st><p>Lamb delivery suite.</p></sec><sec><st>Subjects</st><p>Term lambs in haemorrhagic, asphyxial cardiac arrest.</p></sec><sec><st>Interventions</st><p>Fetal lambs were exsanguinated (~45 mL/kg) followed by umbilical cord occlusion to arrest. After 5 min of asystole, ventilation was followed by coordinated chest compressions. Asystolic lambs were randomised to epi-first (intravenous epinephrine, 0.02 mg/kg and if no ROSC, a 10 mL/kg saline bolus over 5 min), or bolus-first (10 mL/kg saline bolus over 2 min and if no ROSC, followed by intravenous epinephrine). Haemodynamics and blood gases were monitored.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>In the epi-first group, none of the lambs achieved ROSC after epinephrine; ROSC occurred in 11/11 lambs during or immediately after saline bolus. In the bolus-first group, none of the lambs achieved ROSC with bolus alone and 8/9 lambs had ROSC after epinephrine. Mean time to ROSC from start of resuscitation was shorter in epi-first (4.9&plusmn;1.3 vs 6.6&plusmn;0.9 min, p=0.004), but time to ROSC from the time of epinephrine administration was shorter with bolus-first (86&plusmn;43 vs 40&plusmn;21 s, p=0.004). The fetal heart rate did not change significantly despite fetal blood loss.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Our findings support current neonatal resuscitation guidelines of intravenous epinephrine followed by a bolus in neonates with suspected hypovolaemic arrest. Early saline bolus delays epinephrine and ROSC. Careful clinical assessment of haemodynamics in the post-resuscitation phase is critical.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sankaran, D., Vali, P., Giusto, E., Riley, E., Lim, M., Valdez, R., Lesneski, A. L., Li, J., Lane, E., Bowditch, S., Hammitt, V., Persiani, M., Maher, E., Weiner, G., Lakshminrusimha, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-12T09:00:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329674</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329674</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Randomised trial of early rapid saline bolus versus epinephrine during resuscitation in perinatal haemorrhagic cardiac arrest in newborn lambs]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329960v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Combining abdominal ultrasound and radiography for surgical risk stratification in necrotising enterocolitis: a prospective cohort pilot study]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329960v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To evaluate whether combining abdominal ultrasound with radiography improves diagnostic accuracy and surgical risk stratification in neonates with suspected necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) compared with radiography alone.</p></sec><sec><st>Design, setting and patients</st><p>Prospective cohort pilot study conducted in two tertiary neonatal intensive care units. Sixty-seven neonates with suspected NEC underwent concurrent abdominal radiography and ultrasound assessments. Imaging studies were independently reviewed by masked investigators using pre-specified criteria to classify each study as reassuring or non-reassuring.</p></sec><sec><st>Main outcome measures</st><p>The main outcome measure was the need for surgical intervention. Imaging data were analysed using unsupervised k-means clustering (k=2): logistic regression&mdash;testing associations with surgery and principal component analysis (PCA)&mdash;to identify imaging features most contributing to group separation.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Ultrasounds were reassuring in all cases subsequently diagnosed with non-NEC, that is, feeding intolerance, whereas most radiographs in this group were non-reassuring. Clustering based on radiographs alone did not significantly discriminate surgical risk (58.8% vs 39.4%; p=0.11). Combined model (radiograph+ultrasound) produced two distinct clusters with significantly different surgical rates (78.3% vs 34.1%; OR 6.96, 95% CI 2.29 to 24.58). PCA highlighted complex ascites, absent peristalsis and abnormal bowel perfusion as key discriminating features.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Combining abdominal ultrasound with radiography improved the identification of neonates at high surgical risk from NEC, in our pilot study. A reassuring ultrasound reliably identified infants with feeding intolerance, suggesting potential to reduce unnecessary transfers and treatments. Larger multicentre studies are needed to validate these findings and inform development of a unified multimodal imaging score for NEC diagnosis.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Priyadarshi, A., Angiti, R., Chabra, S., McAdams, R., Webb, A., Badawi, N., Hinder, M. K., Tracy, M. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-05T09:00:13-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329960</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329960</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Combining abdominal ultrasound and radiography for surgical risk stratification in necrotising enterocolitis: a prospective cohort pilot study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-05</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329495v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Change in early respiratory management of infants born at less than 30 weeks gestation in England and Wales: an observational cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329495v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To describe changes in early respiratory support for infants born at &lt;30 weeks&rsquo; gestational age (GA) in England and Wales.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Retrospective cohort study using data from the National Neonatal Research Database of all infants born at &lt;30 weeks GA, admitted to neonatal units in England and Wales from 2016 to 2021.</p></sec><sec><st>Main outcome measures</st><p>Methods of respiratory support used in the delivery room and days 1 and 7 of care were determined. Success of the initial non-invasive respiratory support strategy was assessed by any use of mechanical ventilation in the first 7 days of care.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>24 107 babies were included. Use of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) as the highest method of respiratory support for stabilisation increased during the study period (CPAP: 17.3% to 28.8%; HFNC: 0% (first recorded in 2016) to 0.7%). CPAP use increased in the most preterm (&lt;25 weeks GA; 0.7% to 4.8%), the extremely preterm (&lt;28 weeks GA; 7.2% to 17.5%) and the very preterm (28&ndash;29 weeks GA; 29.3% to 44.1%) cohorts. Among those initially stabilised with non-invasive ventilation in this study, 2763 (48.0%) infants required mechanical ventilation in the first week.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>In England and Wales, use of non-invasive respiratory support for initial stabilisation has increased among babies born at &lt;30 weeks GA. 48% of those stabilised with non-invasive ventilation required mechanical ventilation in the first week. A higher quality evidence base for interventions that reduce mechanical ventilation could improve respiratory management in this population.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Farley, H., Szatkowski, L., Knight, M., Ojha, S., Roehr, C. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-04T09:00:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329495</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329495</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Change in early respiratory management of infants born at less than 30 weeks gestation in England and Wales: an observational cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330066v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Evolution of oxygen therapy in preterm infants]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330066v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec id="s1"><st>Introduction</st><p>Oxygen is among the most employed therapies in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Over the past century, therapeutic strategies of oxygen utilisation in preterm infants have fundamentally shifted following advancements demonstrating both the benefits and harms of oxygen therapy. Work published in <I>Archives of Disease in Childhood</I> (<I>ADC</I>) has contributed to the story, from methods of continuous monitoring and oxygen saturation (SpO<SUB>2</SUB>) targeting to a greater understanding of the therapeutic window of oxygen exposure in extremely preterm infants.</p><sec id="s1-1"><st>Early observations of oxygen toxicity</st><p>Concerns for the impact of oxygen toxicity on preterm retinal development date back to the 1940s prior to the availability of cardiorespiratory monitoring to assess oxygenation, with the first large cohort studies published in the early 1950s. One of these studies published in <I>ADC</I> in 1952<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> described potential risk factors for disease in 56 infants with retrolental fibroplasia (the first term for retinopathy of...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gentle, S. J., Stenson, B., Carlo, W. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-04T09:00:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-330066</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-330066</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Evolution of oxygen therapy in preterm infants]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330160v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Umbilical cord milking for non-vigorous term and late preterm neonates: are we there yet?]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330160v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) recently issued a weak recommendation, based on low-certainty evidence, favouring intact umbilical cord milking (UCM) over early cord clamping (ECC) for term and late preterm infants who remain non-vigorous despite initial stimulation.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> This recommendation was primarily informed by evidence from a multicentre, cluster-randomised crossover trial that enrolled 1730 infants.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> The results of this pragmatic trial showed no significant difference in the primary outcome, &lsquo;Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission&rsquo;, for which it was adequately powered. The ILCOR committee, however, based their recommendation on secondary findings, including a reduction in moderate or severe hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE), and improvement in early haemoglobin levels without adverse effects.</p><p>The incidence of moderate to severe HIE was 12/828 (1.4%) in the UCM versus 24/806 (3%) in the ECC group, yielding a crude OR of 0.48 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.96). It is important to note...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rath, C. P., Patole, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-04T09:00:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-330160</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-330160</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Umbilical cord milking for non-vigorous term and late preterm neonates: are we there yet?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-328568v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pooling the unpoolable in preterm fatty acid research]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-328568v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Despite a general understanding of the importance of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and arachidonic acid (ARA) in fetal development and the early postnatal deficits that result after preterm delivery, nutritional strategies to prevent postnatal DHA and ARA deficits and to harness the biological benefit of enteral replacement have been elusive. This shortcoming is critical given the clinical impact of these deficits in the risk of preterm disease in the neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p>In the past few years, there have been six meta-analyses to determine the health benefit and risk of enteral DHA with and without ARA supplementation. The recent publication of Dang <I>et al</I> is one of these studies.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1&ndash;6</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2"></cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3"></cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4"></cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R5"></cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R6"></cross-ref> Dang <I>et al</I> report the results of a meta-analysis of DHA and/or ARA enteral supplementation in preterm infants which included data from 11 unique randomised clinical trials.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R6">6</cross-ref> The...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin, C. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-03-03T09:00:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-328568</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-328568</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pooling the unpoolable in preterm fatty acid research]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-03-03</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2024-327480v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Preterm infants: immunity and immunisation]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2024-327480v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Preterm birth affects around 7&ndash;8% of pregnancies in the UK. There are immunological consequences of preterm birth, epidemiological differences in infectious diseases in the preterm population and differences in immunity after vaccination, both following immunisations received in pregnancy and following vaccines administered to infants themselves. There are also often increased concerns about the side effects experienced by preterm infants following vaccination. It is important that health care professionals and parents are fully informed about the specific issues of vaccination in this group.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Calvert, A., Shaw, E., Jones, C. E., Le Doare, K., Heath, P. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-26T09:00:14-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327480</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2024-327480</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Preterm infants: immunity and immunisation]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-26</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Reviews</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329260v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Time to first passage of meconium in 800 Irish-born healthy term infants: a real-time observational study]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329260v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec id="s1"><st>Background</st><p>Neonatal meconium passage is an important indicator of gastrointestinal function; delayed or absent meconium passage may indicate pathology.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> A 1955 study of 500 term infants found that almost 95% of babies pass meconium by 24 hours, over 99% by 48 hours.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> Obstetric and postnatal practices have evolved significantly in the decades since.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> More recent data have been generated across diverse healthcare systems, primarily using retrospective methods with heterogeneous populations. This study aimed to develop an updated reference range for time to first passage of meconium among healthy, term neonates, delivered in a modern, highly resourced healthcare system.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><st>Methods</st><p>We recruited 800 healthy, term newborns from a tertiary referral obstetric department. Informed consent was obtained antenatally from expectant mothers on the labour ward. Those with known antenatal complications were excluded from the consent process. Those with postnatal admission to the neonatal unit or maternal admission...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Byrne, A., Avalos, G., Rowan, A., Waheed, A., Abidin, N. K., ONeill, R., Kelly, E., Corcoran, A., Saba, L., Moylett, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-25T09:00:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329260</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329260</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Time to first passage of meconium in 800 Irish-born healthy term infants: a real-time observational study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-25</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-328726v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mapping white matter microstructure at term age to motor outcomes at 2 years in very preterm infants: a multicentre cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-328726v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To characterise white matter microstructural differences within very preterm (VPT; &lt;33 weeks&rsquo; gestational age) infants that develop motor impairment in the first 2 years of life.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Cohort study, VPT infants (Cincinnati Infant Neurodevelopment Early Prediction Study) recruited from five level III/IV neonatal intensive care units in the greater Cincinnati area between September 2016 and November 2019.</p></sec><sec><st>Setting</st><p>Multicentre study; participants received MRI at term-equivalent age at Cincinnati Children&rsquo;s Hospital Medical Center and were followed-up at 2 years corrected age to assess their motor performance.</p></sec><sec><st>Patients</st><p>Infants born before 33 weeks were eligible.</p></sec><sec><st>Main outcomes and measures</st><p>Composite motor scores at 2 years corrected age (CA) on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, III. Fractional anisotropy (FA) along the white matter tracts was used to measure white matter microstructure. Motor impairment was defined as Bayley-III motor score &lt;85.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>247 controls and 84 impaired infants were included in the study. Compared with the controls, infants with motor impairment were characterised by location-dependent credible group differences and significantly lower FA in both sensorimotor and non-sensorimotor tracts. A location-specific significant positive association between FA and Bayley scores in the impaired group was observed in multiple sensorimotor tracts and non-sensorimotor tracts. No significant associations were found between FA and Bayley scores in the controls.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>VPT infants developing motor impairments show altered inter and intrahemispheric connectivity, with early indications of impaired visual-motor, sensorimotor and thalamo-cortical connectivity, extending beyond sensorimotor tracts.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joshi, A., Jia, W., Wang, J., Li, H., Altaye, M., Parikh, N., He, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-24T09:00:20-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-328726</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-328726</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mapping white matter microstructure at term age to motor outcomes at 2 years in very preterm infants: a multicentre cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329965v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Early-onset neonatal infection and cognitive impairment: a nationwide cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329965v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To study the effect of early-onset neonatal infection on long-term cognitive impairment including intellectual disability and special educational needs.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>A nationwide register-based cohort study was conducted including near-term to term children born between 1997 and 2013 with follow-up until 2021. Early-onset infection was defined as an invasive bacterial infection within the first week after birth defined by either physician-assigned diagnoses or bacterial pathogens cultured from blood or cerebrospinal fluid. Outcomes included diagnoses of intellectual disability and special educational needs. Associations were estimated by adjusted HRs (aHR) or unadjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR), when exposures and outcomes were rare. Additional analyses were conducted, including sibling-matched analyses and subgroup analyses considering only children with culture-positive infection.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among 993 363 children, 8267 (0.8%) had sepsis and 152 (&lt;0.1%) had meningitis. Of these, 260 had culture-positive sepsis and 31 had culture-positive meningitis. Early-onset sepsis was associated with an increased risk of intellectual disability (aHR: 2.24, 95% CI 1.93 to 2.59) and special educational needs (aHR: 1.49, 95% CI 1.40 to 1.59). Early-onset meningitis was associated with higher risks of both intellectual disability (IRR: 7.75, 95% CI 3.34 to 15.27) and special educational needs (aHR: 2.95, 95% CI 2.06 to 4.22). The associations remained consistent across multiple additional analyses, including sibling-matched analyses and subgroup analyses limited to culture-positive infections.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Early-onset neonatal infection in near-term to term children was associated with an increased risk of long-term cognitive impairment including both intellectual disability and special educational needs.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andersen, M., Rohde, G. B., Nielsen, S. Y., Murra, M., Klingenberg, C., Matthiesen, N. B., Henriksen, T. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-24T09:00:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329965</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329965</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Early-onset neonatal infection and cognitive impairment: a nationwide cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329610v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[High-frequency oscillatory ventilation during physiological-based cord clamping attenuates inflammation in preterm lambs]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329610v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Background</st><p>Adequate lung aeration at birth is essential for a successful transition to extrauterine life. Premature infants are especially vulnerable to injury caused by mechanical ventilation, particularly when exposed to excessive tidal volumes during initial respiratory support.</p></sec><sec><st>Objective</st><p>To evaluate whether high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) initiated at birth facilitates lung aeration and reduces lung inflammation and injury, compared with conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) in preterm lambs.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Preterm lambs (126&plusmn;1 days&rsquo; gestation, term ~148 days) were instrumented to assess blood flow, pressure, oxygenation and blood gases. Lambs were allocated to HFOV (n=6), CMV (n=7) or unventilated control (UVC, n=8) groups. In ventilated groups, respiratory support was initiated during physiological-based cord clamping (PBCC). Lung aeration was assessed by lung ultrasound (LUS) in HFOV lambs. Postmortem lung tissues underwent histological and molecular analyses of inflammation and injury.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>HFOV achieved effective respiratory stabilisation using significantly lower tidal volumes compared with CMV (1.7&plusmn;0.4 vs 6.2&plusmn;1.5 mL/kg, p&lt;0.0001). LUS confirmed rapid lung aeration following HFOV. Histological analyses revealed significantly fewer CD45-positive and CD163-positive inflammatory cells in HFOV lungs compared with CMV (p&lt;0.001 and p&lt;0.05, respectively). Gene expression profiling demonstrated lower expression of key inflammatory and injury markers in HFOV versus CMV lambs, with some levels approaching those observed in UVC (p&lt;0.05).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>HFOV initiated during PBCC supports efficient lung aeration while minimising lung inflammation and injury in preterm lambs. These findings suggest that HFOV may reduce lung inflammation during initial respiratory stabilisation in preterm neonates.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benincasa, B. C., Vandenberg, E. G., Johnson, Z., Zahra, V., Kelly, S. B., Lu, H., Gill, A. W., Thiel, A., Blank, D. A., Weeda, J. A., Silveira, R. C., Procianoy, R. S., Roberts, C. T., Polglase, G. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-24T09:00:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329610</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329610</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[High-frequency oscillatory ventilation during physiological-based cord clamping attenuates inflammation in preterm lambs]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329611v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Neonatal physicians perceptions of message framing when delivering serious news to parents: a randomised crossover study]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329611v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To examine neonatal physicians&rsquo; perceptions of optimistic versus pessimistic prognostic framing when delivering serious news to parents.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Multicentre, double-blind, randomised crossover study.</p></sec><sec><st>Setting</st><p>Conducted online between February and April 2022 at the University Medical Centre Mainz, Germany.</p></sec><sec><st>Participants</st><p>Neonatal physicians from tertiary perinatal centres in Germany, Austria, Switzerland and Italy.</p></sec><sec><st>Intervention</st><p>Participants viewed two scripted videos of a physician&ndash;parent conversation about a very preterm infant with severe intraventricular haemorrhage. Both conveyed identical numerical prognostic estimates but differed in framing: emphasising survival without disability (optimistic) or risk of death and impairment (pessimistic).</p></sec><sec><st>Main outcome measures</st><p>Primary outcome was framing preference. Secondary outcomes included Likert scale ratings of parental preparedness, physician professionalism and compassion, prognostic severity and optimism regarding survival and non-impairment, as well as free-text comments on challenges in prognostic communication.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Of 115 participants, 99 (86%) preferred the optimistic video (period-corrected preference odds (95% CI): 8.6 (7.4 to 9.7)). Optimistic framing was associated with higher ratings of parental preparedness and more favourable evaluations of the consulting physician, including professionalism and compassion, but had no effect on perceived prognostic severity, or optimism about survival or non-impairment. Communication was frequently described as an interpersonal challenge, involving the difficulty of maintaining trust, empathy and hope while communicating under prognostic uncertainty.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Neonatal physicians strongly preferred optimistic framing. Framing effects were primarily affective rather than cognitive and highlight implicit and complex framing biases in neonatal communication.</p></sec><sec><st>Trial registration number</st><p>German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), <A HREF="http://www.drks.de/DRKS00024466">www.drks.de/DRKS00024466</A>.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stu&#x0308;mer, H., Wocheslander, F. A., Hammerle, F., Ko&#x0308;nig, J., Urschitz, M. S., Neuweiler, P., Jaisli, S., Mildenberger, E., Kidszun, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-24T09:00:19-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329611</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329611</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Neonatal physicians perceptions of message framing when delivering serious news to parents: a randomised crossover study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-24</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330247v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Trials of anticonvulsants in the neonatal period require precision in seizure diagnosis]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-330247v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>We read with interest the thought-provoking letter by Clough <I>et al</I><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> and acknowledge the challenges it addressed. Important neonatal seizure research continues to be done using limited montage amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG).<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2 3</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3"></cross-ref> However, significant resources (including funding and personal efforts) are required for successful completion of trials of antiseizure medication in the newborn period, so reliability of results is important. Although use of aEEG may seem pragmatic, a recent Cochrane review<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4">4</cross-ref> includes the statement &lsquo;...cautions clinicians about using aEEG for diagnosing individual seizures and the risk of under- or overtreatment with anti-seizure medications&rsquo;. Hence, not using the gold standard of continuous video EEG (cvEEG) may ultimately cost researchers dearly. Using a methodology with a reduced diagnostic accuracy impacts trial power for all outcome measures including long-term neurodevelopment. It is not only the reduced number of monitoring electrodes that limits this form of...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Battin, M., Hunt, R. W., Davis, S., Sharpe, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-17T09:00:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-330247</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-330247</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Trials of anticonvulsants in the neonatal period require precision in seizure diagnosis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Letter</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-328872v3?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Term neonatal admissions for hypoglycaemia in England and Wales, 2012-2020: a population-based study using the National Neonatal Research Database]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-328872v3?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To evaluate the impact of a change in national guidance on the management of hypoglycaemia on UK term neonatal unit (NNU) admissions, describe perinatal risk factors for hypoglycaemia and identify opportunities to reduce term infant hypoglycaemia admissions.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Retrospective observational cohort study, the UK National Neonatal Research Database.</p></sec><sec><st>Patients</st><p>Term infant NNU admissions in England and Wales, 2012&ndash;2020.</p></sec><sec><st>Main outcome measures</st><p>Term admission rate to NNU primarily for hypoglycaemia/1000 term live births. Change between epoch 1 (36 months before the publication of the British Association of Perinatal Medicine (BAPM) Framework in April 2017) and epoch 2 (36 months after the publication of the BAPM Framework in April 2017).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Term admissions primarily for hypoglycaemia decreased from 4.9 (95% CI 4.8 to 5.1) to 3.3 (95% CI 3.1 to 3.4) admissions/1000 term live births; proportion of potentially avoidable hypoglycaemia admissions (enteral feeds and special care only) decreased (from 12.8% (95% CI 12.1% to 13.4%) to 8.9% (95% CI 8.3% to 9.5%)), time to NNU admission and median length of stay were unchanged between epoch 1 and epoch 2. 46.5% (11 825/25 406) of infants admitted primarily for hypoglycaemia had one or more BAPM hypoglycaemia risk factors. Of infants with hypoglycaemia without BAPM risk factors, 44% (5990/13 581) had a birth weight above the 90th centile or between the 2nd centile and the 9.9th centile.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>The publication of a national framework for term hypoglycaemia management was associated with a reduction in term NNU admission rates without delays in admission time or increased length of stay. One in two infants admitted for hypoglycaemia had no BAPM risk factors. Future research should explore birth weight between the 2nd centile and the 9.9th centile and above the 90th centile as additional factors that may further enhance hypoglycaemia risk stratification.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nezafat Maldonado, B., Conti-Ramsden, F., van Hasselt, T. J., Fleminger, J., Chappell, L. C., Battersby, C., on behalf of the UK Neonatal Collaborative]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-16T09:00:18-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-328872</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-328872</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Term neonatal admissions for hypoglycaemia in England and Wales, 2012-2020: a population-based study using the National Neonatal Research Database]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-16</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329670v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[International survey on enteral nutrition, supplementation and probiotic practices for preterm infants]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329670v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To evaluate enteral feeding practices in preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in high-income countries across three continents, and compare results with a similar survey 13 years earlier.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Web-based survey distributed to neonatologists at 258 NICUs across 15 countries in Europe, Australia, New Zealand and Canada, October 2023 and February 2024. Survey domains focused on availability of human milk, onset of enteral feeding, breast milk fortification (BMF), cytomegalovirus (CMV) screening and enteral supplements including probiotics. Results were compared with a similar survey performed in 2010.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Replies were received from 185 (72%) NICUs. Access to donor human milk (DHM) was high (91%). Across all NICUs, feeds were started on day 1 in 64%, 73% and 85% among infants born &lt;25, 25&ndash;27 and 28&ndash;31 weeks&rsquo; gestation, respectively. Bovine milk-based BMF was routinely used in 88% of NICUs, with large variation in when it was commenced and discontinued. Routine use of human milk-based BMF was uncommon (4%). Maternal CMV status was routinely determined in 33% of all NICUs who then pasteurised or froze milk if the mother was CMV-seropositive. Probiotics were provided in 66% of the NICUs, with large variations in products and birth weight/gestational age criteria.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Compared with our survey from 2010, more NICUs now start feeding preterm infants on day 1, and DHM availability has increased in some countries. Substantial variation remains in the use of BMF, probiotics and CMV screening. A stronger evidence base is needed to update guidelines, aiming ultimately to improve growth and long-term neurodevelopment.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Klingenberg, C., Aunsholt, L., Van Den Akker, C. H. P., Ha&#x0308;ertel, C., Saenz de Pipaon, M., Giannoni, E., ODonnell, C. P. F., Fenton, T., Lehtonen, L., Bohlin, K., Heiring, C., Pereira-Da-Silva, L., Kuschel, C. A., Embleton, N. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-12T09:00:25-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329670</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329670</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[International survey on enteral nutrition, supplementation and probiotic practices for preterm infants]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329885v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Early diagnosis of PHACE syndrome following antenatal diagnosis of cerebellar abnormality]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329885v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>PHACE syndrome is a spectrum disorder involving posterior fossa abnormalities, haemangiomas, arterial lesions, cardiac abnormalities and eye abnormalities.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> A female infant was born in good condition at 37 weeks&rsquo; gestation with an antenatal diagnosis of posterior fossa abnormality following the routine antenatal ultrasound screening programme, and subsequently confirmed on MRI (see <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>). On day 2 of life, her parents noticed prominent small vessels on the right side of her face which had not been present at initial examination (see <cross-ref type="fig" refid="F2">figure 2</cross-ref>). Over the next 48 hours, the area became more red in colour and dermatology review of images raised the possibility of PHACE syndrome with a differential of Sturge-Weber syndrome. The infant had an echocardiogram which showed a 2 mm apical ventricular septal defect. A clinical genetics review within the first week gave a likely diagnosis of PHACE syndrome, which was later confirmed clinically....]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Plumbley-Jones, J., King, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-11T09:00:20-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329885</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329885</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Early diagnosis of PHACE syndrome following antenatal diagnosis of cerebellar abnormality]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-11</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Images in neonatal medicine</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329684v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Combined EEG, aEEG and MRI biomarkers in the neonatal period to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants with neonatal encephalopathy: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329684v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To assess the predictive accuracy of early neurophysiological and neuroimaging biomarkers, alone and in combination, for adverse neurodevelopmental disorders in term-born infants with neonatal encephalopathy (NE).</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Systematic review and meta-analysis conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy guidelines. Eligible studies included infants born at term with NE who underwent amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG) or EEG and MRI of the brain within the first month of life. Adverse outcomes, assessed at 18&ndash;36 months of age, were defined as cerebral palsy, postneonatal epilepsy, severe hearing or visual impairment, moderate-to-severe developmental delay, or death attributable to NE. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and Web of Science from database inception to 10 June 2025; risk of bias of included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-Comparative (QUADAS-C) tool.</p></sec><sec><st>Main outcome measures</st><p>Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of abnormal aEEG background, EEG background, EEG seizures and MRI injury, individually and in combination, for predicting adverse outcomes, pooled using Bayesian bivariate random effects meta-analyses.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>27 studies including 1843 infants were analysed. MRI injury was the individual predictor with higher DOR estimate (31.01, 95% CI 15.07 to 72.82), followed by abnormal EEG background (16.84, 95% CI 5.88 to 50.59), while abnormal aEEG background and EEG seizures performed less well (7.99, 95% CI 2.40 to 33.00; 4.46, 95% CI 1.86 to 11.42). Combining EEG background with MRI injury improved DOR (78.59, 95% CI 19.72 to 321.36) and specificity (93.8%, 95% CI 85.2% to 97.9%) compared with MRI alone.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>MRI is a strong individual predictor of adverse outcomes in NE. Combining it with early EEG improves prognostic accuracy and may better support clinical decision-making.</p></sec><sec><st>PROSPERO registration number</st><p>CRD42024585816.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Biagioni, T., Forrest, C. D., Bonezzi, L., Webb, L., Ware, R. S., Roberts, J. A., Fripp, J., Colditz, P. B., Boyd, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-02-09T09:00:16-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329684</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329684</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Combined EEG, aEEG and MRI biomarkers in the neonatal period to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants with neonatal encephalopathy: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-02-09</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329456v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely preterm infants: an external, population-based validation, comparison and optimisation study of recent prediction models at baseline]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329456v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>Existing predictive models for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) often lack external validation, limiting their clinical use. This study aimed to externally validate recent BPD prediction models using baseline variables, in a population-based cohort.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>This was an external validation study conducted on data collected from 2014 to 2021.</p></sec><sec><st>Setting</st><p>This was a retrospective, multicentre, population-level cohort with prospectively collected data.</p></sec><sec><st>Participants</st><p>Extremely low gestational age neonates recorded in the SwissNeoNet registry across all nine level III neonatal care units in Switzerland (n=1748) were included.</p></sec><sec><st>Interventions</st><p>Recent BPD prediction models estimating the risk of BPD or death at 36 weeks postmenstrual age, based on predictors available within the first 24 hours of life.</p></sec><sec><st>Main outcome measures</st><p>The primary outcome was survival without BPD. A systematic literature search identified five eligible models, which were externally validated and recalibrated for the Swiss cohort. The most performant model was further optimised to improve local applicability.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among 693 screened studies, five models based solely on perinatal variables were included. Without recalibration, models showed fair discrimination (area under the curve (AUC) 0.70&ndash;0.76) but variable calibration (observed/expected (O/E) 0.58&ndash;0.80). After recalibration, AUCs ranged from 0.69 to 0.76, and calibration improved (O/E 0.58&ndash;1.61). The optimised version of the best-performing model demonstrated improved calibration (O/E 1.03) and was validated in the Swiss population.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>By comparing and externally validating existing BPD prediction models, we propose an optimised model using baseline variables at birth, enhancing its applicability to both the Swiss population and similar clinical contexts.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bleeker, C., Adams, M., Schneider, J., Bubl, B., Schulzke, S., Luhmann-Lunt, C. M., Meyer, P., Birkenmaier, A., Bassler, D., Rogdo, B., Tapia Illanes, J. L., Greenberg, R., Laughon, M., Lehert, P., Baud, O., Swiss Neonatal Network]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-30T09:00:17-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329456</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329456</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely preterm infants: an external, population-based validation, comparison and optimisation study of recent prediction models at baseline]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-30</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329370v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Moving beyond the binary of 'preterm versus 'term to address the continuum of risk]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329370v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The relationship between gestational age and long-term developmental outcomes has traditionally been conceptualised through a binary lens of preterm (&lt;37 weeks&rsquo; gestation) versus term delivery. Those born preterm are then further categorised into groupings of extreme, very, moderate and late preterm birth. This categorical framework is challenged by existing research revealing gestational age as a nuanced continuum of risk, with implications for a range of neurodevelopmental outcomes throughout childhood.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1 2</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2"></cross-ref> The recent population-based matched cohort study by de Baat <I>et al</I>,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R3">3</cross-ref> examining the effect of gestational age on special education use, replicates previous findings by MacKay <I>et al</I><cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> in a different population and further adds weight to support a more continuous conceptualisation of preterm birth.</p><p>Special education rates represent a critical public health indicator with implications for educational resource allocation, healthcare system planning and long-term economic productivity.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R4">4</cross-ref> Elevated use of special...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rossetti, L., Cheong, J. L. Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-27T09:00:15-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329370</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329370</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Moving beyond the binary of 'preterm versus 'term to address the continuum of risk]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-27</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329608v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Early postnatal respiratory dynamics in term and late preterm infants with respiratory distress]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329608v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Rationale</st><p>Information on lung volume characteristics in infants with clinical signs of respiratory distress immediately after birth is limited.</p></sec><sec><st>Objectives</st><p>To assess changes in respiratory dynamics and physiological parameters in infants with and without respiratory distress in the delivery room and to determine the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) support.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Electrical impedance tomography data were obtained from late preterm and term infants, born via caesarean section in a tertiary referral centre. Changes in the ratio of inspiratory to expiratory time (Ti/Te-ratio), end-expiratory lung impedance (EELI), oxygen saturation (SpO<SUB>2</SUB>) and heart rate (HR) over the first 10 min as well as corresponding changes after CPAP application were assessed.</p></sec><sec><st>Measurements and main results</st><p>Of 73 infants, 18 (25%) received CPAP after birth (11 not admitted (<I>CPAP</I> group) and 7 admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (<I>CPAP/NICU</I>)). Ti/Te ratio differed significantly between groups with the highest values in the <I>CPAP/NICU</I> group, mostly due to a reduced Te. There was no difference in EELI. Similarly, infants in the <I>CPAP/NICU</I> group had lower SpO<SUB>2</SUB> and HR trajectories over time than the other two groups. After CPAP application, EELI increased significantly. There were no changes in Ti/Te ratio, SpO<SUB>2</SUB> and HR after CPAP initiation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>In infants with more severe respiratory distress, Ti/Te ratio was increased, and SpO<SUB>2</SUB> and HR were reduced, suggesting that these parameters may serve as early predictors of respiratory failure. Application of CPAP resulted in an immediate increase in EELI, highlighting the importance of early CPAP initiation for infants with respiratory distress.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Belting, C., Ramin-Wright, L., Kraus, A., Waldmann, A. D., Bassler, D., Bu&#x0308;chler, V. L., Ga&#x0308;hwiler, K., Ru&#x0308;egger, C. M., Gaertner, V. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-22T09:00:47-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329608</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329608</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Early postnatal respiratory dynamics in term and late preterm infants with respiratory distress]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329757v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Parental experiences of decision-making in the grey zones of neonatal intensive care: a multicentre mixed methodology phenomenological study]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329757v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>Decision-making in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is complex. In grey zones (where there are multiple morally acceptable pathways), families and clinicians may disagree about the best plan. While negative moral phenomena (NMP) such as moral distress are well recognised within clinicians, little is known about parental experiences. We sought to understand parental experiences of decision-making, particularly if parents experienced NMP.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>This was a mixed-methodology phenomenological study, using surveys. Statistical analysis was used for categorical data and thematic analysis for textual data.</p></sec><sec><st>Setting</st><p>Four tertiary or quaternary NICUs in Australia and Canada.</p></sec><sec><st>Participants</st><p>Parents of infants admitted to NICUs between July 2018 and August 2022 who engaged in decision-making in grey zones.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>71 parents (80% mothers) completed the survey. 80% were bereaved.</p><p>Thematic analysis revealed five themes: (1) decision burdens, (2) internal tensions, (3) actualising beliefs and values through decision-making, (4) inauthentic shared decision-making (SDM) and (5) external factors that shaped decision-making.</p><p>Parents reported variable experiences of SDM. Despite decisions being described as burdensome, 89% wanted to be very involved in SDM, while 63% felt included. Actualisation of beliefs and values was important. Time pressures, competing interests and environmental factors influenced internal tensions experienced. Despite framing as SDM, some parents reported feeling coerced and experiences consistent with NMP.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Some parents do experience significant NMP during SDM in the grey zones of the NICU. Clinician awareness of NMP and their antecedents may enhance communication and the SDM process in this challenging setting.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Turley, J., Foo, G., Jewitt, N., Kates Rose, J., Stoopler, M., Bartholomew, B., Tomlinson, C., Greenberg, R. A., Moore, G. P., Prentice, T. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-20T09:00:17-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329757</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329757</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Parental experiences of decision-making in the grey zones of neonatal intensive care: a multicentre mixed methodology phenomenological study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2024-327677v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of different feeding approaches on growth, neonatal morbidities, mortality and neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm infants: a systematic review and network meta-analysis]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2024-327677v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To compare feeding strategies on preterm infants&rsquo; growth during hospitalisation, neonatal morbidities, mortality and neurodevelopmental outcome (NDO) at 18&ndash;26 months corrected age.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension statement for network meta-analysis . We searched five medical databases for randomised controlled trials comparing different feeding approaches in preterm infants and their effects on growth, neonatal morbidities, mortality and NDO. The Cochrane Collaboration&rsquo;s tool was used to assess the risk of bias. We used a random-effects model. Pooled mean differences (MD) or risk ratios with 95% CIs were calculated.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Ninety-five studies (9663 infants) were included.</p><p>Human milk (HM) with bovine milk fortifier (BMF) (adjusted according to blood urea nitrogen) achieved the best length increment (MD=0.56 cm/week; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.93). Notably, HM+BMF (3.5 gm/kg/d protein) showed the best head circumference growth (MD 0.46 cm/week; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.81) but no significant difference in weight gain. There were no significant differences in neonatal morbidities/mortality. While MOM|+PTF (supp) displayed significantly lower NDO delay in the domain of mild cognitive delay.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>Overall, there is a lack of strong evidence to support a specific enteral feeding strategy and further high-quality research is required. Targeted HM fortification appears to improve head growth, while adjusted fortification enhances length. Given the significant inconsistency detected, which may compromise the reliability of the network estimates, these results must be interpreted carefully.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hamouda, N., AboEL-Azm, Y., Elsamman, K., Nabil, S., Tarek, M., Wasia, F. E., Amin, A. M., Elshahat, A., hassan, N., Mektebi, A., Khaled, A., Shahin, H. N., Aldemerdash, M. A., Refaey, N., Khalil, M., Hendi, N. I., Hafez, S., Alabdallat, Y. J., Abdellatif, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-19T09:00:25-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327677</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2024-327677</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of different feeding approaches on growth, neonatal morbidities, mortality and neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm infants: a systematic review and network meta-analysis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2024-328292v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effect of enteral arachidonic acid and docosahexaenoic acid supplementation on brain volumes at term in preterm infants: a secondary outcome analysis of a randomised controlled trial]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2024-328292v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>Investigate whether enteral supplementation with arachidonic acid (AA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), from birth to term-equivalent age (TEA), promotes brain maturation as a prespecified secondary outcome of a multicentre randomised controlled trial.</p></sec><sec><st>Participants</st><p>206 infants born at 22&ndash;28 weeks gestational age (GA) were randomised into intervention or control groups from three university hospitals in Sweden.</p></sec><sec><st>Intervention</st><p>The intervention group received an oil with AA (100 mg/kg/d) and DHA (50 mg/kg/d) starting at birth until 40 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) in addition to standard nutrition. Standard-of-care infants received standard nutrition according to national guidelines.</p></sec><sec><st>Main outcome and measures</st><p>MRI volumetrics were defined <I>a priori</I> as a secondary outcome of the trial and included total brain, white and cortical grey matter, central structures and cerebellum. Univariable and multivariable linear regression models were used for comparisons.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>MRI data in 117 infants had sufficient quality for inclusion (n=58 intervention). Birth weight, GA at birth, sex distribution, and PMA at MRI were similar in the groups. Infants receiving intervention had significantly larger white-matter volume at TEA, as compared with standard of care, in models adjusted for GA at birth, sex, study centre and PMA at MRI (&beta;=6.8 cm<sup>3</sup>, 95% CI 0.7 to 12.9, p=0.028). The contribution of the intervention to white-matter volume corresponded to 10 days of prolonged gestation.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion and relevance</st><p>Our findings in this hypothesis-generating study suggest that AA+DHA promotes white matter growth, which may protect the developing brain in this vulnerable population.</p></sec><sec><st>Trial registration number</st><p><A HREF="NCT03201588">NCT03201588</A>.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hellstro&#x0308;m, W., Lundgren, P., Nilsson, A. K., Nilsson, S., Hard, A.-L., Sjo&#x0308;bom, U., Lo&#x0308;fqvist, C., Bjo&#x0308;rkman-Burtscher, I. M., Wackernagel, D., Hansen-Pupp, I., Smith, L. E., Hallberg, B., Sa&#x0308;vman, K., Ley, D., Hellstro&#x0308;m, A., Heckemann, R. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-19T09:00:24-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2024-328292</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2024-328292</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effect of enteral arachidonic acid and docosahexaenoic acid supplementation on brain volumes at term in preterm infants: a secondary outcome analysis of a randomised controlled trial]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329163v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Suboptimal visual acuity and neurodevelopment at five years in children born very preterm: the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329163v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Introduction</st><p>Children born preterm often have anatomical and functional visual abnormalities, even in the absence of retinopathy of prematurity. This includes suboptimal visual acuity (VA), defined as binocular VA between 5&ndash;6.3/10 and 8/10. We examine relationships between suboptimal VA and neurodevelopment in children born preterm.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Secondary analysis of the French EPIPAGE-2 cohort with children born between 24+0 weeks and 31+6 weeks of gestation, eligible for follow-up at 5.5 years. Children were classified into three VA groups: 5&ndash;6.3/10, 8/10 and 10/10 as reference group. Neurodevelopment was assessed with the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Fourth Edition, the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-II (MABC-2) and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Comparisons between groups were adjusted for neonatal and socioeconomic characteristics using generalised estimating equations models.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Among 1787 included children, 62% had suboptimal VA. Compared with the 10/10 VA group, the mean full-scale IQ decreased by &ndash;3.09 (95 % CI &ndash;4.75 to &ndash;1.42) and &ndash;4.97 (95 % CI &ndash;6.47 to &ndash;3.46) points, the mean MABC-2 total score by &ndash;0.66 (95 % CI &ndash;0.71 to &ndash;0.61) and &ndash;1.06 (95 % CI &ndash;1.09 to &ndash;1.00), and the mean total SDQ scores increased by 0.40 (95 % CI &ndash;0.16 to 0.94) and 0.60 (95 % CI 0.10 to 1.1) in groups with VA groups at 8/10 and 5&ndash;6.3/10, respectively.</p></sec><sec><st>Discussion</st><p>In this French population-based cohort of children born preterm, suboptimal VA was frequent and associated with increased risk of neurodevelopmental difficulties. A comprehensive neurodevelopmental and neurovisual assessment is warranted in children born preterm with suboptimal VA.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hendi, Y., Pierrat, V., Barjol, A., Benhammou, V., Conversy, L., Marchand-Martin, L., Ancel, P. Y., Chapron, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2026-01-06T09:00:17-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329163</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329163</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Suboptimal visual acuity and neurodevelopment at five years in children born very preterm: the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2026-01-06</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329403v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Screening of at-risk ROP patients: use of a single small field image centred on the optic disc]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329403v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>Currently, retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening requires a full retinal examination. To reduce the screening burden, we assessed whether a single optic nerve-centred image could detect treatment-requiring ROP. The objective is to investigate the use of a single image centred around the optic disc to detect treatment-requiring ROP, to reduce the burden of ROP screening with the same security of a full retinal examination.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Retrospective case series.</p></sec><sec><st>Setting</st><p>Tertiary referral centre.</p></sec><sec><st>Population</st><p>Premature infants screened for ROP in a tertiary referral centre.</p></sec><sec><st>Main outcome</st><p>Vascular dilation and tortuosity on a scale from 1 to 5 were blindly labelled by three independent ROP experts using a 8 by 8 mm optic nerve-centred images. Images were automatically generated from images of the routine screening examinations.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>A total of 278 patients (556 eyes) with a mean gestational age of 28.4&plusmn;2.0 weeks and a mean birth weight of 1059.7&plusmn;324.0 g were included. Treatment was needed in 49 eyes (8.8%) of 25 patients. A total of 1510 image sets centred on the optic disc were obtained and analysed. When the cut-off of the vascular dilatation and tortuosity rating was fixed at 3 (equivalent to a severe preplus disease), sensitivity and specificity for the detection of prethreshold type 1 ROP were 100% and 88.9%, respectively.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>ROP screening using a single posterior pole image could reduce stress in premature infants without degrading the quality of screening, compare to iterative dilated complete fundus examination.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Borella, Y., Chapron, T., Metge, F., Abdelmassih, Y., Senicourt, L., Barjol, A., Caputo, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-18T09:00:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329403</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329403</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Screening of at-risk ROP patients: use of a single small field image centred on the optic disc]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329771v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Idiopathic neonatal arterial ischaemic stroke: a trio-based whole-exome sequencing study]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329771v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To assess the contribution of rare coding genetic variants to idiopathic neonatal arterial ischaemic stroke (NAIS).</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Observational genetic study using trio-based whole-exome sequencing (WES).</p></sec><sec><st>Setting</st><p>Multicentre study.</p></sec><sec><st>Patients</st><p>23 newborns diagnosed with idiopathic NAIS and their biological parents.</p></sec><sec><st>Interventions</st><p>WES-trio with a customised workflow for filtering and interpreting variants in <I>de novo</I> autosomal dominant and recessive inheritance models.</p></sec><sec><st>Main outcome measures</st><p>Identification of pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) variants potentially associated with NAIS.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>We identified 28 unique rare <I>de novo</I> variants in 28 genes across 23 newborns with NAIS. Under the autosomal recessive model, no candidate genes were identified. No common P/LP variant across the 23 newborns was detected. <I>In-silico</I> predictors and comprehensive knowledge-driven analysis highlighted <I>PIK3CD</I> (p.Gln431Arg) as a candidate gene in one patient with perforant stroke. However, no more cases were identified with <I>PIK3CD</I> variants, and functional studies are warranted to assess its pathogenicity impact.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Trio-based WES did not identify a monogenic cause for idiopathic NAIS. Coding variants therefore appear unlikely to explain the underlying genetic base of the disease. Furthermore, <I>PIK3CD</I> (p.Gln431Arg) may contribute to perforant stroke, although it requires further association evidence. As the potential role of non-coding or structural variants in NAIS remains possible, genome-wide long-read sequencing approaches may provide further insights into the genetic architecture of this condition.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Olival, J., Hoenicka, J., Arca, G., Arnaez, J., Agut, T., Maynou, J., Stephan-Otto, C., Nunez, C., Benavente, I., Lubian-Lopez, S., Palau, F., Garcia-Alix, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-18T09:00:23-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329771</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329771</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Idiopathic neonatal arterial ischaemic stroke: a trio-based whole-exome sequencing study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-18</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329377v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Reducing antibiotic exposure in early life: how low can we go?]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329377v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The early days of life present clinicians with a paradox. On the one hand, sepsis remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among newborns, demanding rapid initiation of antibiotics. On the other hand, the majority of neonates who receive antibiotics for suspected early-onset sepsis (EOS) are ultimately not infected. This tension between the need to protect infants from life-threatening infection and the imperative to avoid unnecessary exposure lies at the heart of neonatal antibiotic stewardship.</p><p>A new nationwide Swedish study by Gyllensva&#x0308;rd and colleagues casts fresh light on this dilemma.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> Analysing more than one million late-preterm and term neonates born between 2012 and 2020, the authors show striking regional and interhospital variations in antibiotic use during the first postnatal week. Their findings are both reassuring and sobering. Reassuring because overall antibiotic exposure in Sweden and EOS-related mortality are among the lowest globally, but sobering because wide, and seemingly...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Giannoni, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-17T09:00:14-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329377</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329377</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Reducing antibiotic exposure in early life: how low can we go?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329683v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The future of neonatology]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329683v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec id="s1"><st>Introduction</st><p>We welcome the report of the Lancet Child and Adolescent Health Commission on the Future of Neonatology with contributions from a broad range of stakeholders including clinicians, parent and patient groups, and representatives from regulatory and other bodies from around the world.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> We write as UK authors of the report of the Commission. We are glad to have the opportunity to raise awareness of the important issue of optimising and safeguarding newborn health, and to highlight and expand on some of the points made by the Commission. Improving newborn health is a moral imperative, not least because we are living in a period of uncertainty, with war zones affecting even basic neonatal care, but also because trajectories of health and disease are established in early development. A substantial proportion of the population has their future life-long health disrupted by processes operating in early development.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> Hence,...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Modi, N., Robertson, N. J., Hanson, M., De Coppi, P., Abbas-Hanif, A., Turner, M. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-17T09:00:14-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329683</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329683</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The future of neonatology]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-17</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329563v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mothers and newborns always together: when you know better, do better!]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329563v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Newborn infants and mothers should remain together during the first hours after birth. In traditional neonatal care, sick, small or preterm infants have often been excluded from this crucial biological coregulation between mother and newborn.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> According to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and the World Association for Infant Mental Health&rsquo;s <I>Declaration of Infants&rsquo; Rights</I>, newborns have the right to be cared for by their parents and should not be separated from them. This principle is a cornerstone of Infant- and Family-Centred Developmental Care (IFCDC) and represents the most important developmentally supportive intervention for long-term health.</p><p>The WHO strongly emphasises the vision of &lsquo;non-separation of the mother&ndash;newborn dyad&rsquo; in its 2022 recommendations for the care of preterm or low birthweight infants. Immediate or very early and continuous skin-to-skin contact is described as essential for physiological stabilisation, breastfeeding and bonding.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> In its <I>Global Position...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Klemming, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-04T00:46:26-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329563</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329563</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mothers and newborns always together: when you know better, do better!]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329533v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Influence of a rapid volume infusion during advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation of severely asphyxic near-term lambs]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329533v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>We assessed whether an infusion of normal saline volume during chest compression resuscitation, compared with standard intravenous epinephrine, would increase diastolic blood pressure, achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and maintain physiological stability after ROSC.</p></sec><sec><st>Methods</st><p>Near-term fetal lambs were asphyxiated until mean blood pressure reached 10&ndash;12 mm Hg and heart rate was &lt;60 beats per minute. Resuscitation was commenced with ventilation and chest compressions. Lambs were randomly allocated to: standard care (20 &micro;g/kg intravenous epinephrine; n=8) or volume infusion (20 mL/kg over 2 min; n=10). After two allocated treatment doses, rescue intravenous epinephrine was administered if ROSC was not achieved by 8 min. Lambs achieving ROSC were monitored for 60 min. Cerebral histology was assessed for micro-haemorrhages.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Blood pressure and cerebral blood flow during chest compressions was higher in volume infusion lambs. ROSC occurred in 8/8 standard care lambs. Of the volume infusion lambs, 5/10 achieved ROSC in response to allocated treatment, and despite increased diastolic pressure, 3/10 required rescue epinephrine and 2/10 did not achieve ROSC. For 2 min after ROSC, blood pressure, heart rate and arterial partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO<SUB>2</SUB>) was higher in standard care lambs compared with volume infusion lambs. The number of periventricular white matter micro-haemorrhages was higher in volume infusion lambs.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Volume infusion with saline improved blood pressure stability during and after cardiopulmonary resuscitation but was inferior to intravenous epinephrine in achieving ROSC and reducing cerebral micro-haemorrhages. The use of volume infusion during resuscitation in moderately asphyxiated euvolaemic newborns is unlikely to have clinical benefit.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tran, N. T., Gill, A. W., Kluckow, M., Schmo&#x0308;lzer, G. M., Townend, I., Ghaly, N., Lu, H., Galinsky, R., Hooper, S. B., Thiel, A., Roberts, C. T., Polglase, G. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-12-04T00:46:26-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329533</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329533</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Influence of a rapid volume infusion during advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation of severely asphyxic near-term lambs]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-12-04</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329451v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Delayed cord clamping and acute twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome in vaginally born monochorionic twins: a single-centre retrospective cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329451v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To evaluate the prevalence of acute peripartum twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) in vaginally born monochorionic (MC) twin pregnancies, comparing early cord clamping (ECC) to delayed cord clamping (DCC).</p></sec><sec><st>Design, setting and patients</st><p>Single-centre retrospective cohort study including vaginally born MC twins at our institution between January 2020 and April 2025. Acute peripartum TTTS was defined as intertwin haemoglobin (Hb) difference &gt;8 g/dL within 12 hours after birth, without signs of chronic TTTS or twin anaemia polycythaemia sequence. Twins were categorised to the ECC and DCC group if cord clamping occurred &le;60 s or &gt;60 s after birth of the first twin, respectively.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Thirty-five twin pregnancies were included (n=17 in the ECC group; n=18 in the DCC group). Acute peripartum TTTS occurred in 0% (0/17) in the ECC group compared with 17% (3/18) in the DCC group (p&lt;0.01). In the ECC group, no cases of severe brain injury were observed, whereas 8% (3/36) of infants in the DCC group, all with acute peripartum TTTS, showed severe brain injury (p&lt;0.01). DCC time of the first born infant was associated with larger intertwin Hb difference (&beta;=0.01, p=0.04). Potential risk factors for acute TTTS included interval between birth and cord clamping of the first infant (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.03, p&lt;0.03) and total combined diameter of bidirectional placental anastomoses (OR 1.34, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.84, p=0.07).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>DCC in MC twin pregnancies may be associated with a higher prevalence of acute peripartum TTTS and severe brain injury and is therefore not recommended.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rondagh, M., Steggerda, S. J., de Vos, M. S., Hooper, S. B., Crossley, K. J., van den Akker, T., de Vries, L. S., Groene, S. G., Slaghekke, F., te Pas, A. B., Lopriore, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-20T09:00:17-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329451</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329451</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Delayed cord clamping and acute twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome in vaginally born monochorionic twins: a single-centre retrospective cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-20</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329639v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Serial physical examination to reduce unnecessary antibiotic exposure in newborn infants: a population-based study]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329639v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objectives</st><p>While antibiotics save lives in infants with sepsis, up to 12.0% of non-infected term and late preterm infants are exposed to antibiotics underscoring diagnostic challenges in early onset sepsis (EOS).</p><p>This study aimed to assess whether serial physical examination (SPE) in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) could safely reduce early antibiotic exposure in infants born at &ge;34 weeks&rsquo; gestation at risk for EOS.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>A population-based, multicentre interventional study from 2018 throughout 2021.</p></sec><sec><st>Setting</st><p>Six Norwegian tertiary and secondary level NICUs.</p></sec><sec><st>Patients</st><p>In total, 54 713 liveborn infants were eligible for inclusion.</p></sec><sec><st>Interventions</st><p>Infants at risk for EOS (mild/transient clinical signs, chorioamnionitis-exposed or group B streptococcus sepsis in a sibling) were clinically monitored with SPE for 24&ndash;48 hours. Infants with no/transient clinical signs did not receive antibiotics, whereas treatment was initiated without delay if signs indicated severe EOS, clinical condition deteriorated despite intervention or vital signs failed to improve.</p></sec><sec><st>Main outcome measures</st><p>Comparative statistics were used to evaluate changes after implementing SPE, including percentage of infants exposed to antibiotics, incidence of EOS, NICU and safety outcomes (time from birth to antibiotics administration in EOS, infection-related deaths and re-admissions for infection). A statistical process control chart was used to evaluate antibiotic exposure over time.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Infants exposed to antibiotics were reduced by 50%, from 1.8% (95% CI 1.6% to 2.0%) to 0.9% (95% CI 0.8% to 1.1%).</p><p>Incidence of culture-positive EOS, NICU admission rates and safety outcomes remained unchanged.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>SPE reduced antibiotic exposure in infants &ge;34 weeks&rsquo; gestation without compromising safety.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vatne, A., Eriksen, B. H. H., Bergqvist, F., Fagerli, I., Guthe, H. J. T., Iversen, K. V., Ud Din, F. S., van der Weijde, J., Kvaloy, J. T., Rettedal, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-19T09:00:14-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329639</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329639</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Serial physical examination to reduce unnecessary antibiotic exposure in newborn infants: a population-based study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-19</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-328905v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Prospective evaluation of recommendations for nasal insertion depths in neonatal intubation: a prospective quality assurance study]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-328905v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>Recommendations on nasal intubation depths in term or preterm newborns are scarce, although this is the preferred route in some countries. Postmenstrual age (PMA) and weight-based recommendations were recently published by our group.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>A prospective quality assurance study</p></sec><sec><st>Setting</st><p>Single-centre study (University Children&rsquo;s Hospital Tu&#x0308;bingen)</p></sec><sec><st>Patients</st><p>All nasally intubated term and preterm infants between August 2021 and August 2023</p></sec><sec><st>Interventions</st><p>Physicians were free to choose the method of orientation for the insertion depth (our recommendations vs other&rsquo;s (eg, endotracheal tube (ETT) tip markers)). Subsequently, chest X-rays were performed. Correct ETT placement was defined as the tip visible between thoracic vertebrae 1&ndash;3. X-ray investigators were blinded to the method of orientation.</p></sec><sec><st>Main outcome measures</st><p>Main outcome was the rate of correct ETT placements using our previous recommendation compared with other orientations. Secondary, a subgroup analysis for infants &lt;1000 g and a comparison of PMA-based orientations by European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines were performed.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>114 intubations/infants were analysed (39 weight-based; 26 PMA-based; 49 others). Median PMA (IQR) was 30 0/7 weeks (26 6/7&ndash;35 0/7), weight 1310 g (793&ndash;2300). Correct ETT placement was in 74% following our recommendations versus 55% in others (p=0.046). No difference was seen between PMA-based and weight-based recommendations (77 vs 69%; p=0.57). 48 infants &lt;1000 g showed even clearer results; based on ERC guideline, correct placement would have been 27%.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Our previously published recommendations for nasal intubation depths are applicable in routine care leading to a more accurate ETT placement than with other orientations.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maiwald, C. A., Ott, N., Fideler, F., Jock, A. C., Esser, M., Haase, B., Franz, A. R., Poets, C. F., Springer, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-13T09:00:17-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-328905</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-328905</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Prospective evaluation of recommendations for nasal insertion depths in neonatal intubation: a prospective quality assurance study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-13</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329190v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Separation between mothers and newborns directly after birth: mothers experiences of separation - a qualitative analysis from a cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-329190v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>The first hour after birth is a sensitive period for the mother&ndash;newborn dyad and, according to evidence-based routines, should be respected and protected. However, a gap exists between the strive for zero separation and current practices. Therefore, our aim was to investigate mothers&rsquo; experiences of mother&ndash;infant separation directly after birth.</p></sec><sec><st>Design, setting and participants</st><p>A qualitative study based on open-ended questions from a survey. The sample was drawn from an ongoing national cohort study (Mom2B, N=~9000). Data was extracted from responses of participants (n=441) during the period 2023&ndash;2025. We included mothers who had been separated from their newborns directly after birth and who had completed the open-ended questions about separation and their related experiences. Thematic analysis was conducted.</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>One overarching theme emerged: &lsquo;Separation, an experience beyond the mother&rsquo;s control&rsquo;. This theme referred to the healthcare system being organised in such a way that two individuals in need of care from different units could not stay together, even when the individuals were mothers and their newborn. The mothers and their newborns were often separated, even if only one of them needed care, due to existing routines and organisation. Mothers questioned the reasons for separation and described it as anxiety-inducing and traumatic.</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusion</st><p>The mothers&rsquo; experiences and reasons for separation highlight structural obstacles within a healthcare system that need to be addressed to minimise the significant burden of such separation.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Biskop, E., Thernstro&#x0308;m Blomqvist, Y., Diderholm, B., Skalkidou, A., Grandahl, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-11-12T02:47:29-08:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-329190</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-329190</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Separation between mothers and newborns directly after birth: mothers experiences of separation - a qualitative analysis from a cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-11-12</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-328914v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Congenital diaphragmatic hernia and a hernia sac]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2025-328914v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>At 21 weeks of gestation, a fetus was diagnosed with a left-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). At 26 weeks of gestation, fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion (FETO)<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R1">1</cross-ref> was undertaken because of a low lung-to-head ratio (LHR) of 25%. Preterm labour occurred and the infant delivered at 27 weeks of gestation with a birth weight of 1000 g and LHR of 32%.</p><p>At birth, the FETO balloon was deflated ex-utero and the baby was intubated and ventilated. Neonatal management included surfactant administration and inhaled nitric oxide following echocardiogram assessment, and inotropes to treat pulmonary hypertension were given. A right-sided pneumothorax was identified on transillumination which was drained. On a radiograph performed to determine line placement, an inverted sac of the hernia was noted (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="F1">figure 1</cross-ref>).</p><p>Hernial sacs, thin pleuroperitoneal membranes that envelop and contain the herniated abdominal contents, occur in approximately 20% of CDH cases.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="R2">2</cross-ref> CDH sacs can be predicted antenatally via...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patel, A., Nanjundappa, M., Davenport, M., Greenough, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-08-07T23:31:30-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2025-328914</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2025-328914</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Congenital diaphragmatic hernia and a hernia sac]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-08-07</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Images in neonatal medicine</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2024-328346v1?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[School outcomes after HIE: a population-based cohort study]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2024-328346v1?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<sec><st>Objective</st><p>To study the school performance of children with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) relative to population controls from childhood to early adolescence.</p></sec><sec><st>Design</st><p>Population-based cohort study.</p></sec><sec><st>Setting</st><p>New South Wales, Australia.</p></sec><sec><st>Patients</st><p>All 564 159 live-born infants &ge;35 weeks&rsquo; gestation born between 2008 and 2013 were eligible; 550 with HIE and 558 355 population controls.</p></sec><sec><st>Exposure</st><p>Mild, moderate-severe HIE.</p></sec><sec><st>Main outcome measures</st><p>National school assessment performance at 8&ndash;9, 10&ndash;11 and 12&ndash;13 years. Secondary outcomes: reading, writing, spelling, grammar and numeracy scores at these ages. Linear regression models estimated the adjusted mean difference (aMD) at each timepoint. Hierarchical growth-curve modelling assessed academic trajectories (adjusted &beta;).</p></sec><sec><st>Results</st><p>Children with moderate-severe HIE had significantly lower total z-scores compared with controls at 8&ndash;9 years (aMD &ndash;0.70; 95% CI &ndash;0.84 to &ndash;0.52), 10&ndash;11 years (aMD &ndash;0.96; 95% CI &ndash;1.19 to &ndash;0.57) and 12&ndash;13 years (aMD &ndash;0.82; 95% CI &ndash;1.12 to &ndash;0.53), especially in reading and writing. The gap in overall mean scores remained fixed over time. Despite a lower likelihood of passing each year compared with controls, most infants with moderate-severe HIE passed each year (n=103, 62.4%). Children with mild HIE did not perform significantly differently from controls at 8&ndash;9 years (aMD &ndash;0.09; 95% CI &ndash;0.32 to 0.15), although there was a signal of worsening performance with age (&beta;=13.54; 95% CI &ndash;21 to &ndash;6.07).</p></sec><sec><st>Conclusions</st><p>Children with moderate-severe HIE perform at a lower academic level than their peers, yet most meet national standards up to early adolescence. In contrast, children with mild HIE perform on par with their peers. This information is crucial for families: providing reassurance and a basis for needed support.</p></sec>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rees, P., Dronavalli, M., Carter, B., Bajuk, B., Burns, L., Dickson, M., Eastwood, J., Hossain, S., Lawler, K., Lee, E., Munasinghe, S., Page, A., Uebel, H., Dicair, L., Green, C., Gale, C., Oei, J. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2025-06-08T11:39:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2024-328346</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2024-328346</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Open access]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[School outcomes after HIE: a population-based cohort study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2025-06-08</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Original research</prism:section>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2012-303508v2?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[NIDCAP in preterm infants and the neurodevelopmental effect in the first 2 years]]></title>
<link>http://fn.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/archdischild-2012-303508v2?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This paper has been retracted because it contained errors in the data extraction and analyses that affect the results, figures and tables. Data from a study that had been published in two different journal articles were included twice in the analyses. There was an error in the description of the measures used for neurodevelopmental testing in the reporting of the results.</p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fazilleau, L., Parienti, J. J., Bellot, A., Guillois, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2014-04-02T08:32:25-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2012-303508</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:fetalneonatal;archdischild-2012-303508</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[NIDCAP in preterm infants and the neurodevelopmental effect in the first 2 years]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2014-04-02</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Reviews</prism:section>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>